Epstein Secrets

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 5:03 PM To: Peggy Siegal Subject: Fwd: Forwarded messag= From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]= <mailto:[email protected]» Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:16 PM Sub

cessary or proper instruments to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement" To the extent what is=requested is necessary and acceptable to Peggy, it would require a slight addition at the end of paragraph 7. 2. The opening provisions of the Settlement Agreement should name Gary as a party, i

Wednesday, November 19, 2014 5:03 PM To: Peggy Siegal Subject: Fwd: Forwarded messag= From: jeffr

ividually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recita=

cessary or proper instruments to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement" To the extent what is=requested is necessary and acceptable to Peggy, it would require a slight addition at the end of paragraph 7. 2. The opening provisions of the Settlement Agreement should name Gary as a party, i

, November 19, 2014 1:16 AM To: Martin O'Connor Peggy Siegal 1.The note from Gary's attorney at the top of th

mber 19, 2014 1:16 AM To: Martin O'Connor Peggy Siegal 1.The note from Gary's attorney at the top of th

ividually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recita=

x 979 Elizabeth New Jersey 07207-0979 (telephone) (facsimile) Begin forwarded message: From: Date: Novem er , a :12:41 PM EST To: < Subject: Siegal—Peggy_Settlement Agreement.DOC Attorney-Client Privileged Communication Peggy and Martin I have attached a revised version that attempts to accommo

d message: From: Date: Novem er , a :12:41 PM EST To: < Subject: Siegal—Peggy_Settlement Agreement.DOC Attorney-Client Privileged Communication Peggy and Martin I have attached a revised version that attempts to accommodate some of the changes requested by Ms. Dyce but holding firm on the amount

ividually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. I agree. EFTA00626193 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there