Epstein Secrets

p priority in recent years, and Attorney General Holder (among other Justice Department leaders) has hig

trafficking a top priority in recent years, and Attorney General Holder (among other Justice Department leaders) has hig

. Attorney's Office 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein's Sexual Assault Victims in Jane Does 1 & 2 v. United States Dear Mr. Ferrer: My co-counsel, Brad Edwards, and I are writing with a simple request: That your Office continue to view Jane Does 1— 33 as "victims" of Jeffrey Ep

Even if the Office did have such a position, however, we are mystified as to why your Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's obligations regarding production of exculpatory information to criminals, explaining "We're not he

our Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's

PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Re: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. United States, No. 09-80736 Dear Mr. Ferrer: We are writing to you personally on behalf of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in one last effort to try and narrow our range of difference in the pend

our Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's

Even if the Office did have such a position, however, we are mystified as to why your Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's obligations regarding production of exculpatory information to criminals, explaining "We're not he

Professor of Criminal Law Telephone: 801-585-5202 [email protected] Re: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. United States, No. 09-80736 Dear Mr. Ferrer: We are writing to you personally on behalf of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in one last effort to try and narrow our range of difference in the pend

our Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's

Even if the Office did have such a position, however, we are mystified as to why your Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's obligations regarding production of exculpatory information to criminals, explaining "We're not he

ttorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E.4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. United States, No. 09-80736 Dear Mr. Ferrer: We are writing to you personally on behalf of Jane Doe #1. and Jane Doe #2 in one last effort to try and narrow our range of difference in the pen

Even If the Office did have such a position, however, we are mystified as to why your Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's obligations regarding production of exculpatory information to criminals, explaining "We're not he

our Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's

PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Telephone: September 29, 2011 Re: Follow-up on leffre,y Epstein Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, Brad Edwards and I represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in their efforts to protect their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act

our Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's

Even If the Office did have such a position, however, we are mystified as to why your Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's obligations regarding production of exculpatory information to criminals, explaining "We're not he

onald N. Boyce Presidential Profes.f Criminal Law Telephone: [email protected] September 29, 2011 Re: Follow-up on Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, Brad Edwards and I represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in their efforts to protect their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act

multiple reasons. 1. Epstein is Not a Privilege Holder and Thus is Not Covered by Perlman. 14 EFTA002

case: 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth 2. Acosta, R. Alexander 3. Black, Roy 4. Cassell, Paul G. 5. Edwards, Bradley J. 6. Epstein, Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo A. 8. Howell, Jay 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. l• 16. Weinberg, Martin C-1 of 2 EFTA00209356 17. Doe No. 1, Jane 18. Doe No. 2,

multiple reasons. 1. Epstein is Not a Privilege Holder and Thus is Not Covered by Perlman. 14 EFTA002

case: 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth 2. Acosta, R. Alexander 3. Black, Roy 4. Cassell, Paul G. 5. Edwards, Bradley J. 6. Epstein, Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo A. 8. Howell, Jay 9. IMPIIPIS 10. Lefkowitz, Jay 11. Perczek, Jackie 12. libuilm.1 13. ra.c....1.„ , ‘,1„ 1. 14. Sloman, Jeffrey 15