Epstein Secrets

multiple reasons. 1. Epstein is Not a Privilege Holder and Thus is Not Covered by Perlman. 14 EFTA002

ane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 proceed by way of pseudonym as victims of child sexual assault. /s/ Paul G. Cassell Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Attorney for Appellees C-2 of 2 EFTA00209357 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii INTRODUCTION 1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 3 The Epstein Investigation and the Non-

multiple reasons. 1. Epstein is Not a Privilege Holder and Thus is Not Covered by Perlman. 14 EFTA002

ane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 proceed by way of pseudonym as victims of child sexual assault. /s/ Paul G. Cassell Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Attorney for Appellees C-2 of 2 EFTA00209569 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii INTRODUCTION 1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 3 The Epstein Investigation and the Non-

clusion of law reviewed de nova United States v. Holder, 990 F.24 1327, 1328 (D.C.Cfr.1993). l41 The ma

Adam Augustine Caner, Law Office of Adam A. Carter, Washington, DC, for Appellant. Neil Matthew Corwin, U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, for Appellees. Before: and ROGERS, Circuit Judges, SIIIMnior Circuit Judge. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. "1 This case was considered on the record from O 2007 Thom

tensess Goldberg v. UBS AG, 660 F. Supp. 2d 410 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) .. 101, 153 Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 96 N.Y.2d 222 (2001) ........ 143, 146 Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 8. Ct. 2705 (2010) 68, 71, 72 Holmes v. Lorch, 329 F. Supp. 2d 516 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)... 148 In re Chiquita Brands Int'

ki), Martin Wachter, Erwin Wachter, Sercor Treuhand Anstalt, and Asat Trust (Asat). Generally, the district court predicated the dismissals of those Appellees on its conclusions that: (1) a defendant’s indirect funding of al- *19 Qaeda through a charitable intermediary “is, under controlling Second Circuit