Epstein Secrets

f serious concern to me. I described Max's inte=pretation of the marital trust, based on unpleasant legalistic chicanery. To repeat the main points, Eric set up the Trust in Mommoy's name for esta=e purposes. Trust law requires that the funds first pass through a Carol Chomsky Revocable Trust, then b

oice, someone I can regard as reliable and trustworthy. D Love, Avi, Diane and Harry From: Noam Chomsk To: Avi Chomsky mailto Diana Chomsky Harry C omsky <mailto Date: ont> Subject: Response to your letter Still surprised that you had the financial information about the apartment and our Tu

my late years. 6 EFTA_R1_01895571 EFTA02652333 T=e core issue seems to be the marital trust. I've explained how M=and I actually set it up with Eric, which seemed to us just plain common s=nse. I've also explained Max's different interpretation.Q I've asked you for yours, but haven't heard it. B

=remely painful, but in fact surreal. I could never have imagined tha= anything like this would happen in my last years. =orwarded message From: Harry C=omsky < Date: Tue, May 22, 2018 at=2:32 PM Subject: Re: Marital Trust To: Noam Chomsky < <mailto > > I'd like to put together a proposal that I

er would h=ve imagined would darken my late years. The core =ssue seems to be the marital trust. I've explained how M and I a=tually set it up with Eric, which seemed to us just plain common sense.. I've also explained Max's different interpretation. l'=ve asked you for yours, but haven't heard it.

tremely painful, but in fact surreal. I could never have imag=ned that anything like this would happen in my last years. =orwarded message From: Harry C=omsky < Date: Tue, May 22, 2018 at=2:32 PM Subject: Re: Marital Trust To: Noam Chomsky < > > I'd like to put toge=her a proposal that I think wo

er would have imagined would=darken my late years. The core issue seems to be =he marital trust. I've explained how M and I actually set it up =ith Eric, which seemed to us just plain common sense. I've also =xplained Max's different interpretation. I've asked you for =ours, but haven't heard it. But

e: dividing the M=rital trust and then dissolving it, all very simple, needing no lawyers, a= least on my part. 0 On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Harry C=omsky < <mailto > wrote: This is an interesting idea. We could consider it further, but = would need the advice of my lawyer — and I assume you w

have imagined would darken my late years.=/div> The core issue seems to be the marital trust.Q I've explained how M and I actually set it up with Eric, which seem=d to us just plain common sense. I've also explained Max's d=fferent interpretation. I've asked you for yours, but haven'= heard it. But

e: dividing the M=rital trust and then dissolving it, all very simple, needing no lawyers, a= least on my part. D On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Harry C=omsky wrote: 3 EFTA_R1_01904250 EFTA02657874 This is an interesting idea. We could consider it further, but = would need the advice of my lawy