Epstein Secrets

[email protected] Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan

opposing party's case while simultaneously brandishing it as a shield from disclosure of any Achilles heels." Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 677 (S.D. Ha. 2008). Or, as the Eleventh Circuit has articulated the principle, a litigant "can no more advance the work-product doctrine to sustain a unilatera

Suite 400 ISM Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan

pposing party's case while simultaneously brandishing it as a shield from disclosure of any Achilles heels." Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 677 (S.D. Ha. 2008). CONCLUSION The Court should direct the Government to produce to the victims all documents that it previously withheld based on work-produc

3 2, 55y'E 2 po v3 -Is co no. O - COMES NOW ERIC LAMAZARES, who after first being duly sworn, depo

See Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-CV-80119-1CAM (S.D. Fla. filed Feb. 6, 2008); Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-CV-80232-KAM (S.D. Ha. filed Mar. 5, 2008); Jane Doe No. 4 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-CV-80380-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Apr. 14, 2008); Jane Doe No. 5 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No

ants. AFFIDAVIT OE IMPitory,R SERV, a COMES NOW ERIC LAMAZAILES, who after first being duly sworn, dep

rement of complete diversity. (a) Plaintiff= is a citizen of Florida. (Compl. ¶ 2.) 3 See Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-CV-80119-KAM (S.D. Ha. filed Feb. 6, 2008); Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-CV-80232-KAM (S.D. Ha. filed Mar. 5, 2008); Jane Doe No. 4 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No.