Epstein Secrets

ings, but it would never have occurred to us to regard that as my "individual property," or even to imagine separate "individual properties." Again, Eric suggested this pretense solely for tax purposes. We agreed, but the idea that you (and Max) express could never have occurred to us, and I find it

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to y

f serious concern to me. I described Max's inte=pretation of the marital trust, based on unpleasant legalistic chicanery. To repeat the main points, Eric set up the Trust in Mommoy's name for esta=e purposes. Trust law requires that the funds first pass through a Carol Chomsky Revocable Trust, then b

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which is fla=ly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to yo

ings, but it would never have occurred to us to regard that as my "individual property," or even to imagine separate "individual properties." Again, Eric suggested this pretense solely for tax purposes. We agreed, but the idea that you (and Max) express could never have occurred to us, and I find it

of your letter is Max's inte=pretation, which is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "in=ividual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to yo

my "individual=property,"and the other to for M to manage her "individual prope=ty." We had property jointly, not divided into mine and hers. A=ain, Eric suggested this pretense solely for tax purposes. We agreed, but =he idea that you (and Max) express could never have occurred to us, and I =ind it

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which=is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the craz= idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual=property,"and the other to for M to manage her "individual prope=ty." We had property jointly, not divided into mine a