Epstein Secrets

HICKOX,CHARLES C TESTA'S RESTAURANT JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA OCEAN GRAND RESORTS MAHONEY,DANIEL

B BAKER,ANTHONY BORMAN,GINA CHASE,PAUL J BOSSIDY,B H U S TRUST INC

KENT MD,SEBASTIAN PORRECA,VANESSA WRIGHT,SUZANNE FURLO,PAUL W TOWN OF PALM B

1/02/23 Page 3 of 23 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Bellifemine v. Sanoft—Aventis U.S. LLC, 2010 WL 3119374 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2010) 2 Davis v..113. Morgan Chase & Co., 827 F. Supp. 2d 172 (W.D.N.Y. 2011) 2 Doe I v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft et aL, 22-cv-02854-JSR (S.D.N.Y.) (Rakog J.) 4, 12 Geiss v. We

00145645 Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 4 of 23 Willix v. Healthfirst, Inc., 2011 WL 754862 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2011) 2 Wright v. Stern, 553 F. Supp. 2d 337 (S.D.N.Y.2008) 3 iii EFTA00145646 Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 5 of 23 Class Represen

interest May 2 Interest COUNTRYWIDE CAP V 7 OW% DLJE 11101/36 CAU.A8LE PAID ON 4200 1,837 50 AS OF 05/01116 CUSIP: 222388209 May 2 interest P MORGAN CHASE & CO07.900% 042949 D1O0423064,O03008 NTS EWE 5,925.00 PAID ON 150000 AS OF WOO/ 16 CUSIP: 46625HHA1 May 2 Interest CMGROUP CAPITAL XIII EXCIFLT

ual make) vans msy very and thus gentilosses may not be accwaely done using the constant yield met Ixct °themese anorlization ha been dine uslrq the Wright km reflected. Con basis hers been automaton alusted for rnenctkory ematizaficn of bond preniurn on method coupon teweserept munICipd sec unties us

, 22 Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1996) 12 Procacci v. Zacco, 402 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) 21 R.H. Ciccone Properties, Ina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 141 So. 3d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) 15 Rivernider v. Meyer, Case Number 4D14-819 10 SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. v. Henry, 839

6) 7 Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000) 2 Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (FIa. 3d DCA 2013) passim Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) 19, 20, 21 iii EFTA00714923 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This matter arises from the Appellant, Bradle

, 22 Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1996) 12 Procacci v. Zacco, 402 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) 21 R.H. Ciccone Properties, Ina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 141 So. 3d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) 15 Rivernider v. Meyer, Case Number 4D14-819 10 SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. v. Henry, 839

Third DCA opinion in 2000, both of which both 19 Judge Cope and the panel in the SCI case note that 20 the Supreme Court's citation in Levin to Wright 21 vs. Yurko, which I cited in the memorandum, which 22 was a Fifth DCA decision back in 1984, implicitly 23 24 25 recognizes -- that is the

tantial people, .. who were goingto bid itup a bit,'' Luzinski said. • "The system Worked;'' said,Chades Tatelbaum, a lawyer for creditor-JPMorgan.Chase Bank. "In bal;ll9'uptcy court, the idea is to get the' most for creditors, arid th.at's, what happened." The ,auction pro:ved to 'be a bonanza for·credi

ral courts, but more recently, it has faced some appropriate criticism. The rule of abatement is best explained in the Second Circuit case of U.S, v. Wright. In that Wright case, two defendants had pled guilty to embezzlement and tax evasion. Both defendants appealed, but one of the defendants died while