Epstein Secrets

des no assurances—nor could she—that she will not contest the validity and/or voluntariness of such a renunciation once she is actually in France or the United Kingdom. For example, the Government understands that in order to give up one's British citizenship or status, one must be, among other things, "of sound mi

o give up her British citizenship does not mean that she will not fight extradition once in the United Kingdom or that an extradition request to the United Kingdom would be successful. The Government understands from OIA that a defendant's nationality has historically played little to no role in extradition fro

gned in Washington on 25 June 2003, and the Instrument Amending the Treaty of 23 April 19% between the United States of America and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 2004. 2 51, RUE AMPERE - 75017 PARIS - TEL. 01 88 33 51 80 — FAX. 01 88 33 51 81 [email protected] - www.wjavocats.com - PALMS C16

FTA00104548 WILLIAM JULIE AVOCAT A LA COUR - ATTORNEY AT LAW extradition and other removals", ECU-IR 12 April 2012, Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 24027/07, §168). 23. France has no difficulty with deporting individuals who have lost French nationality by application of Article 25 of the

stied in Washington on 25 June 2003. and the Instalment Amending the Treaty of 23 Apil 1996 between the United States of Ameac a and France sgned in the Hague on 30 September 2004. 2 51, RUE AMPERE 75017 PARIS - TEL. 01 88 33 51 80 — FAX. 01 88 33 51 81 vegi0wjavocats.corn - www.whnocats.com - PALMS C16

their national legislation (France, Lebanon, Chili, Qatar, Slovenia). By contrast, many States - in particular, Common law jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, Australia, and the USA, extradite their own citizens. 66. Thus, there is no uniform rule regarding the extradition of nationals under internationa

e signed in Paris on 23 April 1996 by the Instrument Amending the Treaty of 23 April 1996 between the United States of America and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 2004. 9 www.wjavocats.com • palais C1652 EFTA00065684 William JULIE avocet a la coin — attorney at law person's intentions and

their national legislation (France, Lebanon, Chili, Qatar, Slovenia). By contrast, many States - in particular, Common law jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, Australia, and the USA, extradite their own citizens. 66. Thus, there is no uniform rule regarding the extradition of nationals under internationa

e signed in Paris on 23 April 1996 by the Instrument Amending the Treaty of 23 April 1996 between the United States of America and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 2004. 9 www.wjavocats.com • palais C1652 EFTA00154452 William JULIE avocet a la coin — attorney at law person's intentions and

nt made the following point in support of its motion to detain the defendant: "The government has spoken with the Department of Justice attaches in the United Kingdom and France. With respect to France, we have been informed that France will not extradite a French citizen to the United States as a matter of law,

e signed in Paris on 23 April 1996 by the Instrument Amending the Treaty of 23 April 1996 between the United States of America and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 2004. - 75017 paris — fax. www.wjavocats.com palais C1652 9 EFTA00011230 --- PAGE BREAK --- William JULIE avocet a la cour —

ivied in Washington on 25 June 2003, and the Instalment Amending the Treaty of 23 Apnl 1996 between the United States of Amok a and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 2004. 2 51, RUE AmvERE • 75017 RARis tee. 01 88 33 51 80 — FAX. 01 88 33 51 81 wjeJwjavocats.com • WVAV.WiMocats.com - PALMS C165

PAGE BREAK --- WILLIAM JULIE AVOCAT A LA COUR - ATTORNEY AT LAW extradition and other removals", ECtHR 12 April 2012, Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 24027/07, §168). 23. France has no difficulty with deporting individuals who have lost French nationality by application of Article 25 of the