Epstein Secrets

copying and bate stamping process. If my understanding is inaccurate, please let me know immediately. We will proceed right away to get this done. Joe Ackerman From: Seth Lehrman [mailt Sent: Tuesday, December /, 2010 10.2u Am To: Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Subject: In re: RRA Epstein's subpoena Joe, I'

notice and an opportunity to be heard." Georgia Power Co. v. N.L.R.B., 484 F.3d 1288, 1291 (11th Cir.

ts a halt to all proceedings in the bankruptcy court which derive from Circuit Court subpoenas issued to Bankruptcy Trustee, Herbert Stettin. CC: Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. asOlaseta. (050) 224-7000 1488449-7011 VVWW.SEARCYLAW.COM EFTA00314207 #291874/mep JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintif

RETIOS BRIAN P. cei.EY KARL L Dont as BROCA S. POWER JAMES W. GUSTAFSON. JR. JACK P. HAL DAVID K. K

and legally sufficient privilege log, and granting such other and further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper. Respectfully submitted, Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Florida Bar No. 235954 FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive 16 EFTA00582872 Epstein v. Rothstein a

arly absolute immunity. See, e.g., Smith v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 632 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044 EFTA00583810 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XDRAFT 5'1/11 8:14 PM Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 W:180743\ MT

280(c)(1), Ha. R. Civ. P.; compare Medero v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 658 So. 2d 566, 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 19

139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By: 42 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013360 --- PAGE BREAK --- SERVICE LIST Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldb

than that for which it was designed.” S&J Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc., 36 So.3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4" Dist. Ct. App. 2010) (citing Biondo v. Powers, 805 So.2d 67, 69 (Fla. 4" Dist. Ct. App. 2002). As.a consequence, “[w]here the process was used to accomplish the result for which it was intended,