Epstein Secrets

:4 THE COURT: Let ne stop you there so we can 25 added when? .ti put this in context. 6 8 I MR. SCARCER: They wore added by a now list / Joe Ackerman, as I recollect, was representing 2 filed on March 5th of 2018. 2 Mr. Epstein for some period of tine, and he was et 3 THE COURT: Okay. Just to

R. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the next issue It So based upon those two very fundUnantal IS before the Court relates co the plaintiff's II principles, the U.S. Supreme Court recognition, the 19 entitlement to an adverse inference instruction 10 Fifth Anentrient protections do not apply in the 20 arising out of each

:4 THE COURT: Let ne stop you there so we can 25 added when? .ti put this in context. 6 8 I MR. SCARCER: They wore added by a now list / Joe Ackerman, as I recollect, was representing 2 filed on March 5th of 2018. 2 Mr. Epstein for some period of tine, and he was et 3 THE COURT: Okay. Just to

R. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the next issue It So based upon those two very fundUnantal IS before the Court relates co the plaintiff's II principles, the U.S. Supreme Court recognition, the 19 entitlement to an adverse inference instruction 10 Fifth Anentrient protections do not apply in the 20 arising out of each

CLUSION Based on the foregoing, Edwards' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment should be denied. Dated: February 16, 2012. Respectfully submitted, Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Florida Bar No. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Easier Drive West Palm B Telephone: Facsimile: and Christo

pposition to Edwards' MSJ revealing relevant information in pretrial discovery." (emphasis added). The Fourth District explained in Brancaccio that the "Supreme Court has disapproved of procedures which require a party to surrender one constitutional right in order to assert another..." 711 So. 2d, at 1210. Thus,

sts developers, major contractors and subcontractors, principals, engineering and architectural consultants with respect to construction contracts. Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. SHAREHOLDER iac h IIMM Etownload v A Board Certified attorney in Civil Trial Law by The Florida Bar, Joseph Ackerman devotes his practice to

trict Court Northern District of Florida Middle District of Florida Southern District of Florida U.S. Court of Appeals Eleventh Circuit U.S. Supreme Court Certifications Board Certified in Civil Trial Law. National Board of Legal Specialty Certification Rodney J. Janis SHAREHOLDER ach An ex

Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E-mail: ann.marie,c,villafana@usdoLaov Attorney for the Government Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Joseph Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Flagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Criminal Defense Counsel

ip with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office in light of the pre- existing state investigation. In addition to the authorities cited above, the Supreme Court's decision in Heckler'. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985), further supports the interpretation that the CVRA does not provide for judicial intervention in

., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E-mail: ann.marie.c.lillafanaralusdoi.gov Attorney for the Government Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Flagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstei (

empt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(c)(1) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania'. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witness. It hastened to add, "[tjhe ability to

ing using the Court's CM/ECF system: Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ttomey or the vanment Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Joseph Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein (courtesy copy of pleading via U.S. mail) 42 EFT

itted to the practice in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and several other federal courts. 3. I graduated from Princeton University in 1984 with a B.S.E. in civil engineering cum laude. I graduated fro

21, 2011, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA (courtesy copy of pleading via U.S. mail) 10 EFTA00230129 1"Afferr— Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on

empt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(cXI) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witness. It hastened to add, Itthe ability to

ve., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561)820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E-mail: gartmarie.c.viltafana(gusdoj.gov Attorney for the Government Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Joseph Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Flagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Criminal Defense Counsel

itted to the practice in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and several other federal courts. 3. I graduated from Princeton University in 1984 with a B.S.E. in civil engineering can laude. I graduated fro

., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E mail: ann.marie.c.villafana(ieusdoj.gov Attorney for the Government Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Flagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstei (

tempt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(cXI) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania'. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witness. It hastened to add, Itthe ability to