Epstein Secrets

up her claims. Still, Hafele gave Coleman extra time to respond to various motions that he will have to decide before the case goes to trial. Despite Searola's insistence that Edwards had nothing to do with Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, Coleman said the evidence indicates, otherwise. Why else would he try to d

deral act, is unique, he said. "We are treading· _on virgin ground, to use-what is probably an 'inappropriate phrase in this situation," he said . .Scarola said he arid Edwards will ask that the non- prosecution agreement be thrown out., Tha,t would op7n the. possibility thanhe long-she'Ived federal ind

investiga,te and prosecute Epstein in the way tl:u1t shoµld h_ave qccµrred in Florida:. over a decade ago, 11 Reiter said in a. statement. Anc;i, Scarol~ said,_ there are signals that ~ennan's inve.stigatiori is fai: from over. Berman declined to answer questions about whether.others,· such as,Epstein

ents, to answer questions,posed by Epstein’s attorneys. “Brilliant move on their part,” he said. Even if Epstein’s attorneys hadn’t: opened the door, Scarola said the information would have likely come out. He says th&information will help him undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegat

by other young women against Epstein, claiming he paid them for sex • ·• .. : .. :.,_>_, ____ ; when some were as yotmg as 14years old. Attorney Jack Scarola, who is tepresenting Edwards, said his client was compelledto divulge the confidential settlements to answer questfons. posed by 'Epstein's attorney

ame questions that my co-counsel did, you know, was the dysfunction of the critical pivotal video, in the most secure prison east of Florence, out in Colorado known to the MCC before August 10, or was this corruption occurring on August 10, which would again cause us to be skeptical of the servitude of the

t Edwards and Cassell made in this other lawsuit are somehow 2 binding on Ms. Edwards and Cassell had separate legal 3 counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on 4 in that case isn't binding on Ms. 5 Under the relevant rules, an attorney's statements are 6 binding on a client only

separate legal 3 counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on 4 in that case isn't bin

to testify 6 about her need for medications going forward, and he has been 7 the one who's talked about her previous use of medications. 8 Her Colorado doctor testified that she had misled him and not 9 fully disclosed her need for prescription medications, and 10 there's also the question about

By: Kimberly Fontalvo, RPR, CLR Realtime Systems Administrator EFTA00601154 2 1 APPEARANCES: 2 On behalf of Plaintiffs: 3 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA 4 BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 5 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-3626 BY: JACK SCAROLA, ESQ. 6 [email protected]

of Plaintiffs: 3 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA 4 BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 5 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-3626 BY: JACK SCAROLA, ESQ. 6 [email protected] 7 8 On behalf of Defendant: 9 COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. Dadeland Centre II - Suite 1400 10 9150 South Dadeland

Harvard 10:10:45 25 law school graduate, former chief counsel for the EFTA00601190 38 1 U.S. Olympic Committee and a prominent lawyer in 2 Colorado. And I've conferred with her on numerous 3 occasions about litigation and strategy and aspects 4 of this case. 5 Q. Ella Dershowitz? 10:11:05

that Edwards and Cassell made in this other lawsuit are somehow binding on Ms. . Edwards and Cassell had separate legal counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on in that case isn't binding on Ms. 5 Under the relevant rules, an attorney's statements are 6 binding on a client only on

ad separate legal counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on in that case isn't bindin

to testify 6 about her need for medications going forward, and he has been 7 the one who's talked about her previous use of medications. 8 Her Colorado doctor testified that she had misled him and not 9 fully disclosed her need for prescription medications, and 10 there's also the question about

Edwards and Cassell made in this other lawsuit are somehow binding on Ms. Giuffre. Edwards and Cassell had separate legal counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on in that case isn't binding on Ms. Giuffre. Under the relevant rules, an attorney's statements are binding on a client only o

had separate legal counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on in that case isn't binding

who wants to testify about her need for medications going forward, and he has been the one who's talked about her previous use of medications. Her Colorado doctor testified that she had misled him and not fully disclosed her need for prescription medications, and there's also the question about whether

z 22 EFTA00582670 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on May 9, 201 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Plaintiffs, and to Sigrid McCawley, Esquire, Boies Schiller & Flexner, counsel for Jane Doe No. 3, a

ing was sent via E- mail on May 9, 201 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for P

, which forced Dershowitz to seek the issuance of the subpoena through the commission process and ultimately to effect service on Jane Doe No. 3 in Colorado. After all that. Jane Doe No. 3's lawyers asked Dershowitz to consent to having this Court resolve the discovery dispute and for her deposition to b

ail on May 6, 2015,46,; S-204544ar554046 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Pl

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on May 6, 2015,46,; S-204544ar554046 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Plaintiffs, and to Sigrid McCawley, Esquire, Boies Schiller & Flexner, counsel for Jane Doe No. 3, at

3, which forced Dershowitz to seek the issuance of the subpoena through the commission process and ultimately to effect service on Jane Doe No. 3 in Colorado. After all that, Jane Doe No. 3's lawyers asked Dershowitz to consent to having this Court resolve the discovery dispute and for her deposition to

t a law firm for Searcy & Denney — Q. Okay. A. -- Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley. Q. I'm sorry. I missed that last part. A. Oh, it's Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley. That's the law firm. It's all the names. Q. Gotcha. I'm not familiar with that firm. Is that down here? A. It's in West Palm

me with my mother. And then there is my brother He is going to be 18. He is 17 at the moment. And then there is my sister, =. And she lives in Colorado. And she, I'm guessing. is nine. She's around the age of nine. I see her usually in the summers. Q. Okay. So, that's all on your father's side?

E BREAK --- Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 3 of 12 PARTIES 6. Plaintiff Giuffre is an individual who is a citizen of the State of Colorado. 7. Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is not a citizen of the state of Colorado. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 8. Virgi

[email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein case Thank you, Paul. I had reached out to Joan previously to be included on Jack Scarola's e-mail distribution list for the Dershowitz suit, but I wasn't sure if this would also be handled by them. I don't want to double up or inundate you

#: 20150013) Attachments: Complaint.pdf; The Duke of York.pdf Attached is a copy of the Complaint in Case No. CACE 15-000072 and also a copy of Mr. Scarola’s letter to The Duke of York per your request. BE-000029 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584 --- PAGE BREAK --- Is the full transcript of our telephone a rata

by using the Florida Courts eFiling Portal and thus served by electronic mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] to: Jack Scarola, Esq, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., Counsel for Plaintiff, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, Florida 33409; jonijones@

o do with this Florida Defamation Action; rather, he is trying to find a way to send this victim of sexual trafficking to “Jail.” “She was hiding in Colorado...but we found her and she will have to be deposed. The end * For the limited purpose of the Motion to Quash or for Protective Order and resolving t

rshowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 12 of 20 Scarola) and Dershowitz’s extended answer are quoted in full— including Dershowitz’s reference to the oral sex allegation that he now argues this Court shoul