Epstein Secrets

u CtOpare the S By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE 6 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: 4 exhibit lists of Novenber 16th and Densber 22nd, SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART 4 7 which, as I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 8 9 new

I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 8 9 new exhibits were added. By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 10 Your Honor held a hearing in this matter on 9 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE ^ docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil 9 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: Procedure 1.440 first. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0

SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0 not, there is ono agreed matter that we 10 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE 11 would ask the Court to address first. By KAREN TERRY

ou 23 the difference. 23 can't fix today what was wrong in May, 24 If I put his language In, which tied it 24 that's the problem. 25 to the Ponsi scheme, be wouldn't have added 25 THE COURT: The pretrial stipulation, Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793892 2 3 4 5

NBACH, ESQUIRE 5 new exhibit list was filed. If you compare the S By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE 6 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 4 7 exhibit lists of Hovenber 16th and Densber 22nd, which, as I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit

I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 0 9 new exhibits were added. By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE JO Your Honor held a hearing in this matter on 9 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE 11 Deowbor 5th and mud it cl

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 Videotaped Depoeitien ofWILLIAMBERGER Page lb. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB 4 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 5 Direct Examination by Hr. Scarola 5 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 4 Cross-Lamination by Mr. Lick SS Vs. 7 Redirect Examination by Mr. Scarola 131 SCOTT 0.0TNSTBIN, individuall

16 MR. LINK: Sure. Scott Link on behalf 26 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 17 of plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 27 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 19 MR. INDYKE: Darren Indyke on behalf of la 19 plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein. 19 ALSO PRESENT 20 MR. SCAROLA: My name is Jack Scarola

hree child victims? A No. Q Dld there coma a tine when you learned that Rothstein had used the cases that we have been referring to to attract Ponsi schema investor➢? A I learned that sometime in the beginning of November of 2009 by -- , by reading it in the paper. Q prior to that tine, w