Epstein Secrets

uding the award of attorney's fees, striking of pleadings, dismissal of the action, or striking of claims. ### The Clerk shall provide copies to: Jack Scarola, Esq. [Attorney Scarola is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all interested parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a

fees, striking of pleadings, dismissal of the action, or striking of claims. ### The Clerk shall provide copies to: Jack Scarola, Esq. [Attorney Scarola is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all interested parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a certificate of service.]

otion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Penn it Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [D.E. 6326] (the "Motion for Order to Show Cause"), the Responses [D.E. 6351, 6355], and the Reply [D.E. 6358] th

vants claim that current counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in a pending state court case (Scott Link, Esq.) sent counsel for Bradley Edwards in that case (Jack Scarola, Esq.) a flash drive which purported to duplicate "the disc we located in Fowler White's files." DE 6326,1 24. Movants contend that the flash drive

to all registered users on the CM/ECF system, which includes counsel identified on the service list below. SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. yard Counsel for Bradley J. Edwards Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Counsel for

Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Relief (DE 6323; re-docketed as DE 6326) and Bradley Edwards' Joinder in Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause (DE 6325)i. T

el for Mr. Link): I am going to object on the basis of, not only work product protection, but that this exceeds the scope of Judge Ray's order. Mr. Scarola, I know you're allowed to ask questions of the corporate rep here today about when we located the disc and that particular chain of custody, but yo

forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 930 By: W SCOTT J. LINK (FBN Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein 12 EFTA00794267 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny,Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. yard Counsel for Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson Edwards Pottinger L

Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief. (D.E. 6326.) Edwards and L.M. joined that request. (D.E. 6325; D.E. 6345.) Movants allege that Fowler White EFTA

ida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A). Is/ David P. Vitale Jr. Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale Jr. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: [email protected]; and [email protected] Primary E-Ma

al Rule 2090-1(A). Is/ David P. Vitale Jr. Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale Jr. Fl

osition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief, and as grounds therefore states as follows: INTRODUCTION Jeffrey Epstein's Motion, through one misstatement aft

ink, Esq. Link &Rockenbach, PA. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: Fax: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale, Jr., Esq. Florida Bar No.: 11517 Attorney E-Mails: Primary E-Mail: Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhar

ruled we can't use them. We won't use them. MR. SCAROLA: Does that include Mr. Epstein? THE COURT: Does

reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to ■., ■., and Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [DE 6353]. INTRODUCTION In their motion, the Victims sought sanctions against Fowler White and Epstein for illega