Epstein Secrets

: Primary: Second. Second. Second. Second (FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00793363 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel

Second. Second (FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00793363 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Pl

ds did not represent is absolutely improper, as such evidence has no bearing on the malicious prosecution Counterclaim and is unfairly prejudicial. Honeywell Intern., Inc. v. Guilder, 23 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 3nd DCA 2009); Long Tenn Care Found., Inc. v. Martin, 778 So. 2d 1100, 1102-03 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (allegati

n, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 176737 Ton'a Haddad, PA (facsimile) Attorneys for Epstein EFTA00598340 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. Jack Goldber er Es . Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA Marc Nurik, Esq. Brac lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weiss

RVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. Jack Goldber

is germane to the issues in this case, any mention of or use of information from any other case is not. Such information is unfairly prejudicial. Honeywell Intern., Inc. v. Guilder, 23 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). As seen from Edwards's trial exhibit list items above, it is apparent that he intends to use as

RVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Be

neys for Epstein 24 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585443 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . Atte ury, o erger, c Weiss, PA 2

DCA 2009). Moreover, any mention of or use of information from any other case is absolutely improper, as such information is unfairly prejudicial. Honeywell Intern., Inc. v. Guilder, 23 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Long Term Care Found., Inc. v. Martin, 778 So. 2d 1100, 1102-03 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (allegatio