Epstein Secrets

From: Tonja Haddad Coleman CC: Jack Scarola < A. Roberts" <I To: "Mary E. Pirrotta" >, "- k "William B. King" < Subject: RE: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Tue, 24 J

pstein (File #: 291874) Mr. Brewer: We are in receipt of your letter to Judge Hafele regarding the UMC hearingon 6/30/14. Attached is a copy of Mr. Scarola's letter of 6/19/14 to Ms. Coleman which she received and replied that she would respond to Mr. Scarola by today. From: Tonja Haddad Coleman [mailt

From: Tonja Haddad Coleman CC: Jack Scarola < A. Roberts" <I To: "Mary E. Pirrotta" >, "- k "William B. King" < Subject: RE: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:37:54 +0000 ci I>, "Kimberly Good morning Jack: I have reviewed your letter. I am unaware o

nja Haddad Coleman" To: "'Mary E. Pirrotta"' Subject: RE: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:27:39 +0000 Mr. Scarola: Your letter and "supplemental response to discovery" are neither permissible nor acceptable pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The

a [maitto: Sent: Thursday. Au oust 09 2012 4:24 PM To: J Subject: Re: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Mary Pirrotta Secretary to Jack Scarola, Esquire Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone Fax: Email: Privileged

From: "Tonja Haddad Coleman" To: "'Mary E. Pirrotta"' Subject: RE: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:27:39 +0000 Mr. Scarola: Your letter and "supplemental response to discovery" are neither perm

From: "Tonja Haddad Coleman" To: "'Mary E. Pirrotta"' Cc: "'Jack Scarola'" Subject: RE: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:07:45 +0000 Attachments: Notice of Hearing.PDF >, "'Jack G

s against Epstein were being employed to advance a scheme that no longer existed. On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:51 AM, "Tonja Haddad Coleman" < wrote: Mr. Scarola- EFTA00712161 First, Paragraph 13 clearly and unequivocally states "[a]ll e-mails, data, correspondence, and similar documents dated April 1, 2008

From: "Tonja Haddad Coleman" To: "'Mary E. Pirrotta"' Cc: "'Jack Scarola'" Subject: RE: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:07:45 +0000 Attachments: Notice of Hearing.PDF >, "'Jack Goldberger'" Please see attached. T

addad Coleman < To: "Mary E. Pirrotta" Cc: Subject: Re: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:49:12 +0000 Mr. Scarola- I fail to understand why it is that you continually, without fail, unilaterally set hearings. I am unavailable on August 30, and had you bothered en

Cancelation. Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Sent from my iPad On Aug 24, 2012, at 4:03 PM, "Mary E. Pirrotta" < > wrote: Mary Pirrotta Secretary to Jack Scarola, Esquire Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West P Phon Fax: * Privileged and Confidential Electron

From: Tonja Haddad Coleman < To: "Mary E. Pirrotta" Cc: Subject: Re: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:49:12 +0000 Mr. Scarola- I fail to understand why it is that you continually, without fail, uni

ion originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under

From: lesley taylor To: lesley groff Subject: FW: Regarding: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:52:58 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Subject: Re: Regarding: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epste

ion originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected tinder

From: Lesley Groff <I To: Darren Indyke < Subject: Fwd: Regarding: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File 291874) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:27:56 +0000 I want to send this from my work email instead of my personal email Begin forwarded

ion originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under

From: lesley taylor < l> To: lesley gmail Subject: FW: Regarding: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:43:24 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Subject: Re: Regarding: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epste

ion originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under

From: lesley taylor To: lesley gmail Subject: FW: Regarding: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:34:10 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Subject: Re: Regarding: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epste

ion originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under

From: Darren Indyke < To: "CHRISTOPHER E. KNIGHT" • Subject: Re: Regarding: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:09:33 +0000 Chris, I got that, but I just want to understand the rule. Is it due latest 5 days

/AI1M BOWES STARK MATER A STEW SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARN HART et-SHIPLEY,. Tuesday, October 1, 201

lvin Capp, Esquire Mediation, Inc. Regions Financial Tower • 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein Our File No.: 291874 Dear Mr. Capp: Despite the total absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Bradley Edwards participated in