Epstein Secrets

u CtOpare the S By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE 6 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: 4 exhibit lists of Novenber 16th and Densber 22nd, SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART 4 7 which, as I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 8 9 new

I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 8 9 new exhibits were added. By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 10 Your Honor held a hearing in this matter on 9 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it

who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the issue. You've done your job

NBACH, ESQUIRE 5 new exhibit list was filed. If you compare the S By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE 6 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 4 7 exhibit lists of Hovenber 16th and Densber 22nd, which, as I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit

I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 0 9 new exhibits were added. By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE JO Your Honor held a hearing in this matter on 9 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE 11 Deowbor 5th and mud it cl

who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the issue. You've done your job

e Issues, the global 4 order of the Court would be that those 5 individual claims would not be subject to 6 discussion as to the merits, as Mr. Scarola 7 has stipulated. However, as it relates to both probable 9 cause, i.e., motive and malice, the number 10 of claims -- that is, speaking in te

: I was referring to -- THE COURT: There was misconduct at RRA. MR. SCAROLA: -- Mr. Edwards. THE COURT: Whether there was misconduct on behalf of Kr. Edwards, that is, in fact, still a matter of allegation. MR. SCAROLA: Yes, air. And that's the only misconduct I was referring to. THE COURT: Absolutely