Epstein Secrets

afele, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10.1216, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and to all counsel on the attached service list, by email, on March 12, 2018. Jack Scarola, Esq. Karen Terry, Esq. David J. Vitale, Jr. Esq. SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL

GENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes

. v. Australian Warehouses Condo. ffi, 14, 16, 17 962 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) Parrish v. Dougherty, 14 505 So.2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) Pleus v. Crist, 22 14 So.3d 941 (Fla.2009) Poole v. City of Port Orange, 1 33 So.3d 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) iii EFTA00808517 Sica v. Singletarv,

93746 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 8'h day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. and i 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Pla

E I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 8'h day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. and i 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwar

So. 2d at 421. 7 EFTA00793736 respondent is duty-bound to act under the law, and (2) the respondent has failed or refused to do so. Id. (citing Pleus v. Crist, 14 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 2009)). "A third and final element is that the petitioner must have no adequate legal remedy for the respondent's fai

0793784 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Motion was furnished via email this 8th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Shipley, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 1 o- ounse or

shed via email this 8th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Shipley, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-

eed demonstrate only that (1) the respondent is duty-bound to act under the law, and (2) the respondent has failed or refused to do so. Id. (citing Pleus v. Crist, 14 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 2009)). "A third and final element is that the petitioner must have no adequate legal remedy for the respondent's fai