Epstein Secrets

nkrocklaw.com Secondary: [email protected] Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 12 EFTA00805169 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 [email protected] Nichole J. Segal B

[email protected] Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 12 EFTA00805169 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 [email protected] Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach,

, 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Ha. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the i

is April 28, 2013. Electronic Service List Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Be

e and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties listed below, via Electronic Service, this April 28, 2013. Electronic Service List Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, P

he onus of supplying the information or documents is inordinate." Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins, 763 So. 2d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boecher, 733 So. 2d 993, 994 (Fla.1999) (noting the lack of "affidavits, depositions or other sworn testimony in the record to support Allstate's

4 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301• 954.467.1223 EFTA00611634 SERVICE LIST - CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXlVIBAO Jack Scarola, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected] Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, E

CE LIST - CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXlVIBAO Jack Scarola, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected] Sear

r the circuit courts not to interfere with the jurisdiction of the courts of appeal when issues are then pending before them." Id. at 983. See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Titusville Total Health Care, 848 So. 2d 1166, 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("Courts have often held that it is appropriate for one court to stay an

n, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 176737 Ton'a Haddad, PA (facsimile) Attorneys for Epstein EFTA00598340 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. Jack Goldber er Es . Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA Marc Nurik, Esq. Brac lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weiss

RVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. Jack Goldber

, 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the

ing the counterclaim — arose. 4. [See attached Affidavit of ; I suggest we say what is known about Seckel to shift the burden and possibly refute Scarola, e.g., Mr. Seckel is a scientist, businessman, etc.: Mr. Seckel has never been in the presence of the Plaintiff in the company of young women, unde

West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. - 5 - FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 90

are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in the case in which the discovery is sought. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(1); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 1995). 10. "Pretrial discovery was implemented to simplify the issues in a case, to eliminate the element of

ris SERVICE LIST: William B. King Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Philip M. Burlington

d." Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999). "This rule applies in cases of summary judgments as well." Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 546 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 1989); see also Rivernider, supra (holding that although trial judge erred in granting summary judgment based upon the

- CASE NO. 502009CA0408003000CMBAG Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Be

r the circuit courts not to interfere with the jurisdiction of the courts of appeal when issues are then pending before them." Id. at 983. See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Titusville Total Health Care, 848 So. 2d 1166, 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("Courts have often held that it is appropriate for one court to stay an