Epstein Secrets

nt. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was furnished to all counsel on the attached service list, by email, on September 25, 2017. Jack Scarola, Esq. SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 WM, BURLINGTON & ROCKENBACH, P.A. C

, FL 33301 15 954.467.1223 BY: TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE [email protected] 16 17 On behalf of Bradley J. Edwards: 18 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 19 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 20 561.686.6300 BY: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 21 JSX@searc

er trial court decision applying the litigation privilege to a malicious prosecution claim. This decision is on appeal to this Court and is set for Oral Argument on April 28, 2015. 10 EFTA00613599 Florida Supreme Court cases germane to the issues. In Wolfe, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the

February , 2015: William B. King Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes

er trial court decision applying the litigation privilege to a malicious prosecution claim. This decision is on appeal to this Court and is set for Oral Argument on April 28, 2015. 10 EFTA00589630 and Echevarria. See Brief, pp. 11-26. Wolfe is directly on point with the facts and law presented in the case

f taking deposition and proposed response to J. Scarola; revise Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dis

its 3/29/18 0.20 150.00 Order regarding trial; (2) denying Petitioner's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees and Costs; (3) denying request for Oral Argument; (4) denying respondent's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees; and (5) denying Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing of denial of Petitioner's Motion

f taking deposition and proposed response to J. Scarola; revise Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dis

its 3/29/18 0.20 150.00 Order regarding trial; (2) denying Petitioner's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees and Costs; (3) denying request for Oral Argument; (4) denying respondent's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees; and (5) denying Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing of denial of Petitioner's Motion

B [t S 03/22/18 RJG R D fc • 03/22/18 RJG C c; 03/22/18 RJG C h. Inspection; work on it of Certiorari; work on Ause in Bankruptcy . Scarola and D. Vitale .c -Ind changes to •?ction to Unilaterally as with J. lanno re hearing attendance; yke Ile and J. Scarola re ;19 style of case;

ocket re stz 03/15/18 SJL Wt C issell's Motion for Pro H; on Reply to B. Edwards' .tition for Writ of kii, r ; with clients re si . • for Oral Argument; fo o disc 03/15/18 KBR Le . • ti ce/foreign rule and al '' ;; vepare/revise order (st nix Aural defect) of re . C ssell's pro hac vice