Epstein Secrets

By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE ^ docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil 9 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: Procedure 1.440 first. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0

SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0 not, there is ono agreed matter that we 10 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE 11 would ask the Court to address first. By KAREN TERRY

was the case at issue. Rule 1.440 is ono of the most strictly complied with mandatory rules of civil procedure, which has boon recognized by the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and it's ono of those rare instances when a petition for writ of mandamus is appropriate when it's not complied with. So we need to look at the

4 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301• 954.467.1223 EFTA00611634 SERVICE LIST - CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXlVIBAO Jack Scarola, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected] Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, E

CE LIST - CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXlVIBAO Jack Scarola, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected] Sear

ution, and entered Final Judgment in accordance therewith. Edwards timely appealed this Court's ruling as to his Malicious Prosecution count to the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The issue was fully briefed, and on November 12, 2015, Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301• 954.467.1223 EFTA0061163

- CASE NO. 502009CA0408003000CMBAG Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Be

ution, and entered Final Judgment in accordance therewith. Edwards timely appealed this Court's ruling as to his Malicious Prosecution count to the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The issue was fully briefed, and on November 12, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed this Court's ruling and certified conflict with