Epstein Secrets

73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶16. 74. Edwards gave not

robative in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶21. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00726030 have run a

73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law finn of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 116. 74. Edwards gave not

in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and Edwards's settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 121. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00081213 Case 9:08-

73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶16. 74. Edwards gave not

in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and Edwards's settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 121. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00188897 Case 9:08-