Epstein Secrets

piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a big interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB input, but this needs a str

t this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think a

. Maybe we do agree to a big inte=view with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to be wa= ga

this has to be wa= gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get S= input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or some=ody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide to d= nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think

. Maybe =e do agree to a big interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like th=t. But this has to be war ga

t. Obviously I can EFTA_R1_01805707 EFTA02610744 contribute, can= would be great to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's wh= I think Hiltzig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if i= the end you decide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a stru=tured way to think

. Maybe we do agree to a big=interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to =e war ga

this has to =e war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to =et SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or=somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide=to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think

ecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and where w= can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a big intervie= with you-- Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to be war gam=d out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB inpu=, but this needs a st

this has to be war gam=d out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB inpu=, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or somebody assemb=ing a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide to do nothing, a= least you've come up with a structured way to think

iecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be =nd where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a =ig interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has =o be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great =o get SB input, but this needs a s

this has =o be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great =o get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig=or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you dec=de to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to thi=k

iecemeal response. Figure out whe=e we want to be and where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe =e do agree to a big interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like th=t. But this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can= would be great to get SB input, but this needs a s

this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can= would be great to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's wh= I think Hiltzig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if i= the end you decide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a stru=tured way to think