Epstein Secrets

tiff's MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Jean Luc Bruhnel. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (Kudman, Tama) (Entered: 03/12/2010) 05/06/2010 107 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment Including Supporting Memorandum of Law by Jeffrey Epstein. Re

. (ir) (Entered: 05/17/2010) 05/18/2010 22 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by JANE DOE No. 103 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/18/2010) 05/19/2010 23 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Any pending motions are denied as moot. This case is CLOSED

Defendant Class Code: CLOSED Closed: Yes Statute: 28:1391 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Demand Amount: $0 NOS Description: Personal Injury Attorneys Katherine Warthen Ezell [COR LD NTC] Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagter Street Suite 800 Miami , FL 33130-1780 USA 305-358-280

Time to File Response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike by JANE DOE No. 103. (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/13/2010) 05/17/2010 21 ENDORSED ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 20 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 14

tiff's MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Jean Luc Bruhnel. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (Kudman, Tama) (Entered: 03/12/2010) 05/28/2010 76 RESPONSE/REPLY to (545 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court, Pl

Doe No. 102's Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jane Doe No. 102, Jane Doe No. 101 (Ezell, Katherine) Modified on 7/30/2009 (tp). (Entered: 07/28/2009) 07/29/2009 222 NOTICE of Striking 221 Notice of Compliance, filed by Jane Doe No. 10

o File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiff's Reponse In Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss by Jane Doe No. 101. (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/21/2009) 05/21/2009 98 RESPONSE/REPLY to 89 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike 78 Reply to Response to Motion to Dismiss First

EFTA00226908 Jane Doe no 102 Consol Plaintiff Jane Doc no 101 Consol Plaintiff Jane Doe II Consol Plaintiff Jane Doe no 6 Consol Plaintiff Katherine Warthen Ezell [COR LD NM] Podhurst Orseck Josefsbera Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami , FL 33130-1780 USA 305-358-2800

Defendant identifies Jean Luc Brunel in his probation papers as residing with him within the period of December 2009 to February 2010, when Ms. Kudman represented him to be out of Florida. As indicated in our previous pleading, Mr. Brunel was served for deposition, and his counsel Ms. Kudman r

a.com Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits lawyerswillits@aol

efendant Epstein. Shortly after Brunel was served, counsel for Jane Doe was contacted by Tama Beth Kudman, Esq., a licensed attorney in Florida. Kudman stated that she represented Brunel with regard to the subpoena and that she would produce Brunel for deposition in West Palm Beach if Jane Doe woul

Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits lawyerswillits@aol

rm. Defendant identifies Jean Luc Brunel in his probation papers as residing with him within the period of December 2009 to February 2010, when Ms. Kudman represented him to be out of Florida. As indicated in our previous pleading, Mr. Brunel was served for deposition, and his counsel Ms. Kudman repr

[email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected]

rm. Defendant identifies Jean Luc Brunel in his probation papers as residing with him within the period of December 2009 to February 2010, when Ms. Kudman represented him to be out of Florida. As indicated in our previous pleading, Mr. Brunel was served for deposition, and his counsel Ms. Kudman repr

tein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. lilt i iS m Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsber Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein 4 EFTA01660114 Case 9:

30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Kudman, Tama on 3/12/2010 at 5:47 PM EST and filed on 3/12/2010 Case Name: Doe v. Epstein Case Number: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Filer: Jean Luc Bruhnel Docu

ectronically mailed to: Adam D. Horowitz Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Alan Goldberger Jack Patrick Hill Jeffrey Marc Herman Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsber g Robert Deweese Critton , Jr Stuart S. Mennelstein 9:08-cv-8011

y Defendant Epstein. Shortly after Brunel was served, counsel for Jane Doe was contacted by Tama Beth Kudman, Esq., a licensed attorney in Florida. Kudman stated that she represented Brunel with regard to the subpoena and that she would produce Brunel for deposition in West Palm Beach if Jane Doe woul

ited States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er Esq. Robert D. Critton Esq. Isidro Manual Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg 8 EFTA01660098 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 483 Entered on