Epstein Secrets

g Badly: False beliefs and their consequences. American Journal of Psychology. 121, 643-660. Wright, D. & Loftus, E.F. (2008) Eyewitness Memory. in Cohen, G. and Conway, M.A. (Eds) Memory 26 EFTA00073095 in the Real World, 3rd Edition. Hove and New York: Psychology Press., p 91-106. Laney, C., Kaa

and the litigation process. Toronto, Canada: Law Society of Upper Canada. Loftus, E.F. & Cole, W. (1977). A century of thought [A review of Meyer, R. E., Thinking and problem solving. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co., 1977]. Contemporary Psychology, 22, 691-692. 1978 Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G., &

for this reason, the CI has been found to reduce misleading question effects in most of the studies where this has been tested (Geiselman, Fisher, Cohen, Holland & Surtes, 1986; Memon, Zaragoza, Clifford & Kidd, 2010; Milne & Bull, 2003 — however, see LaPaglia, Wilford, Rivard, Chan, & Fisher, in pre

, & Cutler, B.L. (1999). Examining the cognitive interview in a double- test paradigm. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 5, 29-45. Brown, C. L. & Geiselman, R. E. (1990). Eyewitness testimony of mentally retarded: Effect of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 6, 14-22. EFTA0165

response to the need to improve police interview tech- niques and to avoid the legal problems of hypnosis, Geiselman and Fisher (Geiselman, Fisher, Cohen, Holland, & Suites, 1986; Geiselman, Fisher, Firstenberg, Hutton, Sullivan, Avetissian, & Prosk, 1984; Geiselman, Fisher, MacKinnon, & Holland, 198

course as a function of their relevance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Ffentory and Cognition. 9. 130-138. Fit. R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (in press). Memory-enhancemeru tech- niques far investigative interviewing: The Cognitive interview Spring- field, IL: Charles C. Thorns,- Fisher. R