Epstein Secrets

ent 8:12 35:19 37:5 41:17 41:22,23 42:8 46:6,13 COHEN 2:10 affidavit 18:11 24:5 arguments 8:13 42:16

0 16:21 18:2025:17,17 27:7 33:9 38:18,18,20 38:20,22,22 42:15,18 43:12 45:7 47:9,19 48:9,13 maybe 23:3 24:2 27:9 38:23 42:15 ma'am 4:18 6:21 McClean 29:8,22 31:1 McLACHLAN 24:11 24:12,25 25:9 McLAUCHLAN 2:13 4:6,7 7:14 8:22 10:21 10:25 11:9 25:6 mean 39:7 40:10 42:19 means 32:18 meant 24:1

because 10 and RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN. by 10 of his obvious concern about the allegati

OUELLETTE & MA LDIN RT REPORTERS, INC. EFTA00787710 Page 29 Page 31 1 provisions of Title 11. I order. That is by definition in the In Re: McClean case, 2 Courts have held, and we've cited them in 2 and countless other 11th Circuit cases, and lower court 3 our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts

NK, Esquire and RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffr

laid out, I don't think there could ever be a basis for it, but this also gets to the discovery point, and even though the 11th Circuit in In Re: McClean, they affirm a finding of punitive damages, which are by definition criminal, because it's punishment, as opposed to purely compensatory damages,