Epstein Secrets

to Response to Motion re12 MOTION to Intervene MOTION for Sanctions OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A SUA SPONTE RULE 11 ORDER filed by Bruce Reinhart. (Reinhart, Bruce) (Entered: 05/23/2011) 05/30/2011 M RESPONSE in Opposition reji MOTION Motion to Supplement Authorities re IQ Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1

Federal offense." Second, the court must identify the direct and proximate effects of that behavior on parties other than the United States. In re Stewart, 552 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2008). If the criminal behavior causes a party direct and proximate harmful effect, the party is considered a victim under

nwcionminonya iee - Other ISM*/ • • • FA,. Designee Repair Slat* Person ApprOwIdts TrinatiOn Canada Aint011eindaS OfOuP Oate of Approval or Reinhart 5 - 6 - 1/ Genital, or Signature of 'un su Ind, Dessmairon No. 526705494 „.... . t FAA F0fIll 337 .+7 B/5/91 7:33 PM 1085FACE.WPS Michael

ngled mine appmpitata fulcra: t record. An afternoon must:* compatage with au preverica atm 'ie.ons Ao attute continued conformity wan Ina app4e4ble Stewart hin•SS 100010 111011/. I 046600100 of 060 t1tC4106100110 HI win space As mewed inethetilettionet snails ;Sway with ancsala hation>lity end reptsfra

ant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. Within months after the non-prosecution agreement was signed, Reinhart left the Office and immediately went into private practice as a "white collar" criminal defense attorney. His office coincidentally happened to be

and be heard during some phases of the prosecution of the person charged with the crime." Id. at 1285-86 (footnote omitted and emphasis added). In Stewart, the issue was whether individuals who had purchased houses from various real estate developers were victims under the CVRA, when the purchasers wer