Epstein Secrets

harge involving a telephone call made by Epstein while he was on his private jet. During this telephone call, Epstein warned his personal assistant, Lesley Groff, against turning over documents and electronic evidence responsive to a subpoena issued by a federal grand July in the Southern District of Florida

ffice wrote in an e-mail to defense counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the

counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly." The U.S. Attorn

>» EFTA00213368 UNITED STATES vs, JEFFREY EPS I PAN PLEA PROFFER On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt and traveled to the home of Lesley Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena in connection with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. Ms. Groff works as

f Lesley Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena in connection with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. Ms. Groff works as the personal assistant of the defendant. Ms. Groff began speaking with the agents and then excused herself to go upstairs to check on Whil

STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. INFORMATION The United States Attorney charges that: COUNT 1 On or about August 21, 2007, in Miami-Dade County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, did intentionally harass another person, that i. in an attemp

I have drafted up a factual proffer that I would use at the change of plea based upon our brief conversation and the agents' interaction with Ms. Groff at her home. The agents and I would need to speak with Ms d Ms. Groff briefly to confirm that these facts are true. eefree to make suggestions. O

7 01:08:1T. »> EFTA00213700 UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER On August 2007, FBI Special Agent..1====M -traveled to the home of Lesley Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena in connection with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. Ms. Groff works as

estions. On an "avoid the press" note. I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly. Do you want to c

ates also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to MI, Lesley Groff, or ." (DE 407 at ¶ 40.) The NPA also provided that: "The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. If the

pstein, including but not limited to MI, Lesley Groff, or ." (DE 407 at ¶ 40.) The NPA also provided t

d, "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the [co-conspirator] telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly." They also discu

d conditions of the Agreement also precludes the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above."41 29. On Septembe

herwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal

g: "On an `avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the [co-conspirator] telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then 3-1 Exhibit 13. 35 Exhibit 15; RFP WPB 000066.000074 (Exhibit 52). 36 RFP WPB 000124-000126 (Exhibit 53). 13 EFTA00804340 Ca

d conditions of the Agreement also precludes the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above."41 29. On Septembe

herwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal

g: "On an `avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the [co-conspirator] telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then 3-1 Exhibit 13. 35 Exhibit 15; RFP WPB 000066.000074 (Exhibit 52). 36 RFP WPB 000124-000126 (Exhibit 53). 13 EFTA00591617 Ca

• I have drafted up a factual proffer that I would use at the change of plea based upon our brief conversation and the agents' interaction with Ms. Groff at her home. The agents and I would need to speak with Ms. Marcinkova and Ms. Groff briefly to confirm that these facts are true. Feel free to make

will not institute any criminal I charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including_but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adrian Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkeva. Further, upon execution of this agreement and a plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office, the federal Grand Jury inves

gestions. On an "avoid the press" note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly. Do you want to c

hange of plea based upon our brief conversation and the agents' interaction with Ms. home. The agents and I would need to speak with Ms. and Ms. Groff briefly to confum that these facts are true. Feel free to make suggestions. On an "avoid the press" note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane wa

r_O 046 EFTA00235372 UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents and a INE. traveled to the home of Lesley Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena in connection with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. Ms. Groff works as

estions. On an "avoid the press" note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly. Do you want to c

d conditions of the Agreement also precludes the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above."41 29. On Septembe

herwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal

g: "On an `avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the [co-conspirator] telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then 34 Exhibit 13. 33 Exhibit 15; RFP WPB 000066-000074 (Exhibit 52). 36 RFP WPB 000124.000I26 (Exhibit 53). 13 EFTA00185470 Cas

fice wrote in an e-mail to defense counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the

counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly." The 7 EFTA002