Epstein Secrets

ll be deferred" provided that Epstein met certain conditions. Additionally, the Agreement extended immunity to Epstein's named co-conspirators, • Lesley Groff, [and ' as well as "any potential co-conspirators" of Epstein's. In return for federal immunity, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to two low-level

y to Epstein's named co-conspirators, • Lesley Groff, [and ' as well as "any potential co-conspirato

his or her oath. 10 The DOD's failure to discipline its own prosecutors heightens the importance of the CVRA's private right of action. The DOD's Office of Professional Responsibility ('OPR") conducted a review of the Epstein case. While the Report found that prosecutors exercised "poor judgment; it concluded they did not commit

ace.f1§-91 In October 2019, amended her complaint to include over 20 co orate entities associated with Epstein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and as enablers [1701 Katlyn Doe, et at v. Epstein's estate (2019) EFTA00261789 5/22/22, 1:31 PM JeflYeyEps - Wklpeclie WIKIPEDIA SEXC.FIC -

stein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and as enablers [1701 Katlyn Doe, et at v. Epst

roin the victims and instead urged them to have "patience...LI* J[11-.5.1 According to an internal review conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility, which was released in November 2020, Acosta showed "poor judgment" in granting Epstein a non-prosecution agreement and failing to notify Epstein'

stein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and as enablers.L1Za Katlyn Doe, et at v. Epste

lace.11 1 In October 2019, amended her complaint to include over 20 corporate entities associated with Epstein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and as enablers.L1Za Katlyn Doe, et at v. Epstein's estate (2019) httpsfien.wikipedia.orgAsnki/Jeffrey_Epstein 13160 EFTA00263119 . 5/22/22, 1

nt from the victims and instead urged them to have "patience" .1141(115) According to an internal review conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility, which was released in November 2020, Acosta showed "poor judgment" in granting Epstein a non-prosecution agreement and failing to notify Epstein'

he abuse took place.11--1L mended her complaint to include over 20 corporate entities associated with Epstein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and a M ils enablers. L' 1 Katlyn Doe, etal. v. Epstein's estate (2019) httrisliran wikinedia nrn/wikitleffrAv Fnstain VA/N1 EFTA00263837 PEST

stein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and a M ils enablers. L' 1 Katlyn Doe, etal. v.

ment from the victims and instead urged them to have "patience" [ ][x!51 According to an internal review conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility, which was released in November 2020, Acosta showed "poor judgment" in granting Epstein a non-prosecution agreement and failing to notify Epstein'

stein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and Cimberly Espinosa as enablers.07°] Katlyn Do

e.DW In October 2019, Araoz amended her complaint to include over 20 corporate entities associated with Epstein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and Cimberly Espinosa as enablers.07°] Katlyn Doe, et at v. Epstein's estate (2019) EFTA00264313 • . moo. c_c_)wwt RA-VCRS - A 50SC 5/22/22

ent froth the victims and instead urged them to have "patience".a1-41 51 According to an internal review conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility, which was released in November 2020, Acosta showed "poor judgment" in granting Epstein a non-prosecution agreement and failing to notify Epstein's

D§91 In October 2019, Araoz amended her complaint to include over 20 corporate entities associated with Epstein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and Cimberly Espinosa as enablers [1701. Katlyn Doe, et at v. Epstein's estate (2019) https://en.wicipedia.orgMiki/Jeffrey_Epstein 13/60 EFTA002

stein and named the additional individuals Lesley Groff and Cimberly Espinosa as enablers [1701. Katlyn

ement from the victims and instead urged them to have "patience".1141(M) According to an internal review conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility, which was released in November 2020, Acosta showed "poor judgment" in granting Epstein a non-prosecution agreement and failing to notify Epstein'

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. Further, upon execution of

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. Further, upon execution of this agreement and a plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office, the federal Grand Jury inves

randum Subject Jane Does Nos. 1 and 2.'. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA (S.D.Fla.) Daft April 26, 2011 To From Assistant Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Attached please fmd a CD-ROM containing the victims' Moti

255 37 8/15/2007 Subpoena to Bear Stearns (return date 9/4/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Adam Perrylang (return date 9/4/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Lesley Groff (return date 9/4/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Jean-Luc Brunel (return date 9/4/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Harry Beller (return date 9/11/07) 8/16/20

Material EFTA00225440 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 9/12/2007 A. Marie Villafatia Nathan Z. Dershowitz Ms. Groff will proceed by interview. 9/12/2007 Meeting (US: Andy Lourie, Rolando Garcia and Marie Villafafia, DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourt and Jack G

osure is "in connection with a judicial proceeding," that is, in connection with an administrative proceeding conducted by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) arising out of a decision by United States District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in the matter of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2I United States, S.D. Fl

oenas. See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution Agreement. It also guarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such i. | and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised hi

d in the Grand Jury subpoena such i. | and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand

tions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confident