Epstein Secrets

From: Lesley Groff To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Call List Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:00:23 +0000 I will try to set up times for you so yo

From: Lesley Groff To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sub

2011 20:00:23 +0000 I will try to set up times for you so you can call these people directly between now and 5pm I called Merkin's office. He is in Sacramento. If they hear from him, they will ask him to give you a call between now and 5pm. I had Woody but could not connect due to "no line availabl " wou

the massage tables set up In several rooms upstairs. Epstein also enlisted his staff in the predatory activity, and four—Sarah Kellen, Adrian Ross, Lesley Groff, and —figured in the FBI Investigation. The Non Prosecution Agreement stipulated that they would not be charged. According to police reports and sw

ivity, and four—Sarah Kellen, Adrian Ross, Lesley Groff, and —figured in the FBI Investigation. The Non

was a troubled teenager, whose slender figure, delicate complexion, hesitant voice and soulful blue eyes made her look young for her years. Born in Sacramento, California, in August 1983, Virginia spent her early years on a small ranch on the West Coast of America. This seemingly idyllic childhood ended w

Subject: Dick Merkin From: Lesley Groff <lesley.jee@gmailcom> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2011 12:35:05 PM To: [email protected]" <[email protected]> Dick Merkin left a voicemail l

Subject: Dick Merkin From: Lesley Groff <lesley.jee@gmailcom> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2

@gmail.com" <[email protected]> Dick Merkin left a voicemail last night saying he knows you have Been trying to reach him. he was in china then Sacramento. He said china was interesting. Please give him. Call. (- Sent from my iPhone EFTA_R1_00032337 EFTA01742017

From: Lesley Groff Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2011 12:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Dick Merkin Dick Merkin left a voicemail last night saying he knows y

From: Lesley Groff Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2011 12:35 PM To: jee

[email protected] Subject: Dick Merkin Dick Merkin left a voicemail last night saying he knows you have Been trying=to reach him...he was in china then Sacramento. He said china was interesti=g. Please give him. Call. Sent from my iPhone=?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <IDOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD P

From: Lesley Groff Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2011 12:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Dick Merkin Dick Merkin left a voicemail last night saying he knows y

From: Lesley Groff Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2011 12:35 PM To: jee

[email protected] Subject: Dick Merkin Dick Merkin left a voicemail last night saying he knows you have Been trying=to reach him...he was in china then Sacramento. He said china was interesti=g. Please give him. Call. Sent from my iPhone=?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <IDOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD P

f Epstein, including but not limited to Lesley Groff, or NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from t

d States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any otential co-cons irators of Epstein, including but not limited to Lesley Groff, or NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defendant does not poin

Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012) Colorado v. Connelly, 51 479 U.S. 157 (1986) 139, 141, 142 Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (1987) 138 County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998) 152 Cruz v. Maypa, 773 F.3d 138 (4th Cir. 2014) 43 Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011) 122 Doe 1 v. Un

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. I at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defen

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. I at 2

Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012) Colorado v. Connelly, 51 479 U.S. 157 (1986) 139, 141, 142 Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (1987) 138 County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998) 152 Cruz v. Maypa, 773 F.3d 138 (4th Cir. 2014) 43 Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011) 122 Doe I v. Un

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defen

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 2

Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012) Colorado v. Connelly, 51 479 U.S. 157 (1986) 139, 141, 142 Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (1987) 138 County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998) 152 Cruz v. Maypa, 773 F.3d 138 (4th Cir. 2014) 43 Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011) 122 Doe 1 v. Un

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defen

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 2

Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012) Colorado v. Connelly, 51 479 U.S. 157 (1986) 139, 141, 142 Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (1987) 138 County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998) 152 Cruz v. Maypa, 773 F.3d 138 (4th Cir. 2014) 43 Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011) 122 Doe 1 v. Un

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defen

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 2

cham Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012) 37 Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986) 97, 98, 99 Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (1987) 97 County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998) Cruz v. Maypa, 773 F.3d 138 (4th Cir. 2014) Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011) Doe No. 1. v. United Stat