Epstein Secrets

From: Lesley Groff < To: Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 20:02:59 +0000 Sweet. Thanks. And the book arrives that you sent JE! Sent from my iPho

From: Lesley Groff < To: Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Fri,

From: Lesley Groff < To: Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 20:02:59 +0000 Sweet. Thanks. And the book arrives that you sent JE! Sent from my iPhone On Jul 11, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Yes! And will leave chocolate on your desk!! Xo

From: Rosa da Silva To: Lesley Groff <I Subject: RE: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:52:15 +0000 Sweet. Thanks Lesley. From: Lesley Groff [mailto Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 10:51 AM

From: Rosa da Silva To: Lesley Groff <I Subject: RE: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:52:15

From: Rosa da Silva To: Lesley Groff <I Subject: RE: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:52:15 +0000 Sweet. Thanks Lesley. From: Lesley Groff [mailto Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 10:51 AM To: Rosa da Silva Subject: Re: Hi Rosa...yes, 5:45pm will wo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE 43 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, LESLEY GROFF and Defendants. No. 17 Civ. 00616 (JGK) MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO LETTER MOTION TO OPPOSE ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON MAXWELL Plaintiff, Jane Doe 4

v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, LESLEY GROFF and Defendants. No. 17 Civ. 00616 (JGK) MEMORA

eek? Thank you. Brad As of this writing, no response was received to this email. However, on November 8, 2017, Ms. Menninger appeared before Judge Sweet — in this Court — to argue a confidentiality issue on behalf of defendant Maxwell including arguments as to the type of protective order that should

10007-1312 Re: Jane Doe 43 v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Civil Action No. 17-cv-616 Dear Judge Koeltl: We represent Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Lesley Groff ("Defendants") and write to respond to Bradley J. Edwards' letter of October 5, 2017. Mr. Edwards' contention that Plaintiff be allowed to depose M

e represent Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Lesley Groff ("Defendants") and write to respond to Bradley J

fendants' request, and issued an Order under seal, directing (a) Defendants to make their application for relief from the Protective Order to Judge Sweet and (b) file their Motion to Dismiss within seven (7) days after Judge Sweet's decision (the "July 17 Order"). Contrary to Mr. Edwards' contention,

To: ballerina friend From: Lesley Groff Sent Wed 2/14/2018 4:53:48 PM Subject Re: awe!! Sweet...ok this is helpful-... > On Feb 14, 2018, at 11:51 AM, wrote: > • this is a graphic

To: ballerina friend From: Lesley Groff Sent Wed 2/14/2018 4:53:48 PM Subject Re: aw

To: ballerina friend From: Lesley Groff Sent Wed 2/14/2018 4:53:48 PM Subject Re: awe!! Sweet...ok this is helpful-... > On Feb 14, 2018, at 11:51 AM, wrote: > • this is a graphic work i sent > and also the peom , the most important :) >

f Epstein, including but not limited to Lesley Groff, or NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from t

d States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any otential co-cons irators of Epstein, including but not limited to Lesley Groff, or NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defendant does not poin

y 29, 2016 Meeting Exhibit 6: November 30, 2018 Email Exhibit 7: December 6, 2018 Email Exhibit 8: February 28, 2019 Government Letter to Judge Sweet Exhibit 9: February 28, 2019 Government Letter to Judge Netbum Exhibit 10: Transcript of April 22, 2016 Deposition Exhibit 11: Transcript of July

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. I at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defen

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. I at 2

ome provisions and adding language that confidential material could be disclosed to law enforcement. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. B). On March 18, 2016, Judge Sweet entered a protective order governing the discovery and dissemination of confidential information after the parties agreed to the form of the order o

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defen

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 2

y 29, 2016 Meeting Exhibit 6: November 30, 2018 Email Exhibit 7: December 6, 2018 Email Exhibit 8: February 28, 2019 Government Letter to Judge Sweet Exhibit 9: February 28, 2019 Government Letter to Judge Netburn Exhibit 10: Transcript of April 22, 2016 Deposition Exhibit 11: Transcript of Jul

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defen

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 2

y 29, 2016 Meeting Exhibit 6: November 30, 2018 Email Exhibit 7: December 6, 2018 Email Exhibit 8: February 28, 2019 Government Letter to Judge Sweet Exhibit 9: February 28, 2019 Government Letter to Judge Netburn Exhibit 10: Transcript of April 22, 2016 Deposition Exhibit 11: Transcript of Jul

will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defen

ot limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 2

me provisions and adding language that confidential material could be disclosed to law enforcement. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. B).31 On March 18, 2016, Judge Sweet entered a protective order governing the discovery and dissemination of confidential information after the parties agreed to the form of the order o