Epstein Secrets

to Horizon Title Services, but the wire details indicate that Epstein purchased a home for Visoski. The wire details read: "Visoski Purchase of 1e Lesley Groff was one of the four co-conspirators given immunity in connection with Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM.

re details read: "Visoski Purchase of 1e Lesley Groff was one of the four co-conspirators given immunit

l Promissory note 6/21/2017 Visoski $12,500 Bank of America Jeffrey Epstein N/A 8/1/2017 $30,000 TD Bank Jeffrey Epstein N/A 12/19/2017 Lesley Groff & Daniel Groff $100,000 E Trade Bank Southern Financial N/A 1/12/2018 Lawrence P Visoski $150,000 Bank of America Southern Financial Promiss

Southern Financial N/A 1/12/2018 Lawrence P Visoski $150,000 Bank of America Southern Financial Promissory note 2/2/2018 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. (Ghislaine Maxwell)" $21,379 Wells Fargo Bank Darren K. Indyke PLLC N/A 2/12/2018 Aviloop LLC'2 $40,000 TD Bank Jeffre E . stein N/

e PLLC (A) $480,000 3 $2,200,000' Erica Kellerhals Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC (A) Gratitude America, Ltd. (A) 0 N/A 40* $46,221,541" Lesley Groff Darren K. Indyke PLLC (E) 12* $420,235 N/A N/A Accountant Harry Beller HBRK Associates, Inc. (A) 2 $26,000* N/A N/A Richard Kahn Coatue

represented by Haddon in the suit. 5 Gut. thLink & Rockenbach, P.A. Lesley Groff 19 $5,509,464 Jeffrey Epstein Link & Rockenbach represented Groff and Epstein in the Jane Doe 43 lawsuit. It is possible that these payments were made solely for the benefit of Epstein. The transaction dates coi

missory note 6/21/2017 Larry Visoski $12,500 Bank of America Jeffrey Epstein N/A 8/1/2017 $30,000 TD Bank Jeffrey Epstein N/A 12/19/2017 Lesley Groff & Daniel Groff $100,000 E Trade Bank Southern Financial N/A 1/12/2018 Lawrence P Visoski $150,000 Bank of America Southern Financial Promiss

accuser? The payments coincided with Dershowitz's involvement in the suit. Epstein was not represented by Coffey Burlington. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman P.C. Ghislaine Maxwell 6 587,902 Darren K. Indyke PLLC Haddon represented Maxwell in connection with a lawsuit filed by Epstein accuser 31

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE 43 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, LESLEY GROFF and Defendants. No. 17 Civ. 00616 (JGK) MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO LETTER MOTION TO OPPOSE ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON MAXWELL Plaintiff, Jane Doe 4

v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, LESLEY GROFF and Defendants. No. 17 Civ. 00616 (JGK) MEMORA

MAXWELL Plaintiff, Jane Doe 43, by and through the undersigned counsel, now responds to the letter motion on behalf of non-party Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. ("Haddon Morgan") requesting that the Court withdraw its order permitting alternative service of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell or, in the alter

ken by him occurred during the litigation of his abuse of process claim against Edwards. For support, he relies primarily on the decision of Wolfe v. Foreman, 2013 WL 3724763 (Fla. 3d DCA July 17, 2013), wherein the Third District found that the litigation privilege barred both an abuse of process claim a

ED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER” On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards traveled to the home of Leslie Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. Ms. Groff works as the personal as

ed to the home of Leslie Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. Ms. Groff works as the personal assistant of the defendant. Ms. Groff began speaking with the agents and then excused herself to go upstairs to check on her sl