Epstein Secrets

charge involving a telephone call made by Epstein while he was on his private jet. During the telephone call, Epstein warned his personal assistant, Lesley Groff, against turning over documents and electronic evidence responsive to a subpoena issued by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida

. She wrote in an e-mail to defense counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the

idea of the charged that we had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255." Id. The e- mail also asked permission from Epstein's counsel to send to Ocariz a copy of parts of the plea agreement: "With respect to question 2 [a question from Ocariz regarding "[w]hen will it be possible to see the plea ag

n the more accurate term "boyfriend" to describe the connection. Id. at 268 Lefkowitz further stated the boyfriend had a business relationship with Ocariz and that the boyfriend would have financially benefitted from the presumably lucrative referral of sexual assault cases against Epstein to Ocariz.

harge involving a telephone call made by Epstein while he was on his private jet. During the telephone call, Epstein warned his personal assistant, Lesley Groff, against turning over documents and electronic evidence responsive to a subpoena issued by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida

. She wrote in an e-mail to defense counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the

idea of the charges that we had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255." Id. The e-mail also asked permission from Epstein's counsel to send to Ocariz a copy of parts of the plea agreement: "With respect to question 2 [a question from Ocariz regarding "[w]hen will it be possible to see the plea ag

Lefkowitz also stated that had misleadingly used the term "friend" rather than the more accurate term "boyfriend" to describe who had recommended Ocariz. Id. at 268. Lefkowitz further stated the boyfriend had a business relationship with Ocariz and that the boyfriend would have financially benefitt

charge involving a telephone call made by Epstein while he was on his private jet. During the telephone call, Epstein warned his personal assistant, Lesley Groff, against turning over documents and electronic evidence responsive to a subpoena issued by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida

. She wrote in an e-mail to defense counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the

idea of the charged that we had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255." Id. The e- mail also asked permission from Epstein's counsel to send to Ocariz a copy of parts of the plea agreement: "With respect to question 2 [a question from Ocariz regarding "[w]hen will it be possible to see the plea ag

n the more accurate term "boyfriend" to describe the connection. Id. at 268 Lefkowitz further stated the boyfriend had a business relationship with Ocariz and that the boyfriend would have financially benefitted from the presumably lucrative referral of sexual assault cases against Epstein to Ocariz.

harge involving a telephone call made by Epstein while he was on his private jet. During the telephone call, Epstein warned his personal assistant, Lesley Groff, against turning over documents and electronic evidence responsive to a subpoena issued by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida

. She wrote in an e-mail to defense counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the

idea of the charges that we had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255." Id. The e-mail also asked permission from Epstein's counsel to send to Ocariz a copy of parts of the plea agreement: "With respect to question 2 [a question from Ocariz regarding "[w]hen will it be possible to see the plea ag

Lefkowitz also stated that had misleadingly used the term "friend" rather than the more accurate term "boyfriend" to describe who had recommended Ocariz. Id. at 268. Lefkowitz further stated the boyfriend had a business relationship with Ocariz and that the boyfriend would have financially benefitt

oenas. See Tab 2], September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A ement. It alsoguarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised

in the Grand Jury subpoena such as , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand

present the unnamed women in claims against Epstein). 26. The next day, advised the defense that she was removing one of the alternatives to Mr. Ocariz from our consideration, on the basis that "one of his partners is married to an AUSA here," and explained that, because of that personal relationshi

See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A reernenThiso_auarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as Sarah , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised

ruction charges, many of the facts I included in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our discussions and the agents' observations of Ms. Groff. We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of those facts. On a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private

nt the unnamed women in claims against Epstein). 26. The next day, AUSA advised the defense that she was removing one of the alternatives to Mr. Ocariz from our consideration, on the basis that "one of his partners is married to an AUSA here," and explained that, because of that personal relationshi

ne Maxwell, and/or any other employee or associate of Jeffrey Epstein. 2. Any. and all photographs, whether printed or digital, of Jeffrey Epstein, i Se Lesley Groff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and/or any other employee or associate of Jeffrey Epstein. 3, Any and all e-mails, instant messages, chats, text messages, voic

ou have received from Jeffrey Epstein, MM Lesley Groff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and/or any other employee or

ise is that I “assiduously” hid from you the fact that Bert Ocariz is a friend of my boyfriend and that I have a “longstanding relationship” with Mr. Ocariz. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012577 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, Eso. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 2 OF 5 I informed you that I selected Mr. Ocariz because he was a friend and

ited States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal char esitsin any potential co-conspirator of E tein including but g not limited to Lesley Groff, or . Further, upon execution of this agreement and a plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office, the federal Grand Jury investigation will b

of E tein including but g not limited to Lesley Groff, or . Further, upon execution of this agreement

S_Atty_Cor_001 55 EFTA00235481 MIWong. To "Jay LotkovAte cc bce SubOM Conference call WW' 09/25/200712:11 PM Hi Jay — Have you approved Mr. Ocariz as the girls' representative? And can we have a conference call to discuss what I may disclose to him and to the girls regarding the agreement? Th

oenas. See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution Agreement. It also guarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such i. | and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised hi

d in the Grand Jury subpoena such i. | and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand

the unnamed women in claims against Epstein). The next day, AUSA Villafana advised the defense that she was removing one of the alternatives to Mr. Ocariz from our consideration, on the basis that “one of his partners is married to an AUSA here,” and explained that, because of that personal relationship