Epstein Secrets

oenas. See Tab 2], September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A ement. It alsoguarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised

in the Grand Jury subpoena such as , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand

approval) promised to close the money-laundering investigation "if the sex offense case is resolved." See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter from I. to G. Lefcourt ("In other words, if the sex offense case is resolved, the Office would close its investigation into other areas as well. The matter has not been,

See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A reernenThiso_auarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as Sarah , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised

ruction charges, many of the facts I included in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our discussions and the agents' observations of Ms. Groff. We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of those facts. On a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private

approval) promised to close the money-laundering investigation "if the sex offense case is resolved." See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter from M. to G. Lefcourt ("In other words, if the sex offense case is resolved, the Office would close its investigation into other areas as well. The matter has not been,

d conditions of the Agreement also precludes the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above."41 29. On Septembe

herwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal

/18/08 Lefkowitz Ltr to AMCV" containing handwritten draft notes for proposed letter to J. Lefkowitz; 5/22/07 e-mail from to M. re meeting with G. Lefcourt with attached email from G. Lefcourt re solicitation for meetings Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Suppl. Box #3 P-013304 Thru P-013325

255 37 8/15/2007 Subpoena to Bear Stearns (return date 9/4/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Adam Perrylang (return date 9/4/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Lesley Groff (return date 9/4/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Jean-Luc Brunel (return date 9/4/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Harry Beller (return date 9/11/07) 8/16/20

Material EFTA00225440 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 9/12/2007 A. Marie Villafatia Nathan Z. Dershowitz Ms. Groff will proceed by interview. 9/12/2007 Meeting (US: Andy Lourie, Rolando Garcia and Marie Villafafia, DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourt and Jack G

ll disclose even more. If meeting is held, Villafaiii will ask to have the case reassigned. Attached email correspondence between Andrew Laurie and G. Lefcourt 28/C-4 5/31/2007 Subpoena to J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc. (return date 6/21/07) 5/31/2007 Subpoena to J. Epstein & Company, Inc. (re

oenas. See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution Agreement. It also guarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such i. | and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised hi

d in the Grand Jury subpoena such i. | and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand

) promised to close the money-laundering investigation “if the sex offense case is resolved.” See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to G. Lefcourt (“In other words, if the sex offense case is resolved, the Office would close its investigation into other areas as well. The matter has not been, an