Epstein Secrets

oenas. See Tab 2], September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A ement. It alsoguarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised

in the Grand Jury subpoena such as , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand

bmissions include: a summary of the irregularities and misconduct that occurred during the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Atto

See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A reernenThiso_auarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as Sarah , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised

ruction charges, many of the facts I included in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our discussions and the agents' observations of Ms. Groff. We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of those facts. On a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private

e in the West Palm Beach Division of the Southern District of Florida, for making misrepresentations during a prior sentencing proceeding. In fact, Stephanie Thacker, a former deputy to CEOS Chief Drew Oosterbaan, has stated that she knew of no other case like this being prosecuted by CEOS. 3 08-80736-CV-MARRA

poenas. See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A reement. It also uarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised

ed in the Grand Jury subpoena such as and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand

bmissions include: a summary of the irregularities and misconduct that occurred during the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Atto

From: Polina Belomlinskaya To: Lesley Groff Subject: Re: Regarding meeting today Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:08:00 +0000 Hi Lesley, do you have an office number for by any chance? I've just

From: Polina Belomlinskaya To: Lesley Groff Subject: Re: Regarding meeting today Date: Tue,

Joe Whitney: I think this might be Joe Whitley: Holly, Joe's assistant , Kyle ICnas assistant to Ken Starr: work, Jackie Borrero is her work, Stephanie Thacker: work Again, sorry if some of these are misspelled. Best, Polina On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Lesley Groff wrote: Hi Polina and welcome!

From: To: Lesley Groff Subject: Re: Regarding meeting today Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:43:17 +0000 Okay, 12:30 until we hear otherwise. Thank you. Best, On Mon, Apr 28

From: To: Lesley Groff Subject: Re: Regarding meeting today Date: Mon

e meeting. People who's numbers I need: Marty Weinberg Jay Lefkowitz Alan Dershewitz Ken Star Lilly Sanchez Guy Lewis Mike Tein Joe Whitney Stephanie Thacker Again, sorry if some of these are misspelled. Best, On Mor ipr 28, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Lesley Groff < > wrote: Hi and welcome! I have laryngitis

From: Lesley Groff To: Subject: Re: Regarding meeting today Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:13:51 +0000 ;) good deal! On Apr 28, 2014, at 11:13 AM, wrote: Thank you so

From: Lesley Groff To: Subject: Re: Regarding meeting today Date:

t, Jackie Borrero is her EFTA00370391 Guy Lewis: Mike Tein: P, work, work, Joe Whitney: I think this might be Joe Whitley: Joe's assistant Stephanie Thacker: P, Again, sorry if some of these are misspelled. Best, work P, work, Holly, On Mat 28, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Lesley Groff < > wrote: Hi and w

From: Lesley Groff <MINIII > To: Jefffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Call List update Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:04:35 +0000 LM for Faith (she just ste

From: Lesley Groff <MINIII > To: Jefffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmai

y Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Call List update Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:04:35 +0000 LM for Faith (she just stepped in to a meeting), Stephanie Thacker and John Brockman EFTA00435481

ept by or on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, He Lesley Groff, and/or . This request includes information that

TO SUBPOENA OLY-65/2 NES, LLC diaries, or other records of appointmenis, travel, meetings and the like, kept by or on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, He Lesley Groff, and/or . This request includes information that is kept in physical “hard copy” and/or electronic form, whether stored on a personal computer, data

As all prosecutors know, there are no perfect witnesses. Particularly in Cases involving exploited children, as one member of your defense team, Ms, Thacker, surely knows from her work at CEOS, it is not uncommon for victim-witnesses to give conflicting statements. The prosecutors are in the best position

ubmissions include: a summary of the irregularities and misconduct that occurred during the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attor

subpoenas. See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution Agreement. It also guarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised hi

tified in the Grand Jury subpoena such and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand