3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
mitted. 2. It is then processed for an open sub-band frequency and filed with FCC 3. The FCC submit
isn't a complaint filed the sub-band frequency is released to be programmed into the radio. a. If the complaint is valid then the process between Micronet and the FCC is repeated. I verified this information with Hector and Allan during our meeting. They stated approximately the same steps, they have
mitted. 2. It is then processed =or an open sub-band frequency and filed with FCC 3. The FCC submit
e isn't = complaint filed the sub-band frequency is released to be programmed =nto the radio. a. If the complaint is =alid then the process between Micronet and the FCC is repeated. I verified this =nformation with Hector and Allan during our meeting. They stated =pproximately the same steps, they have
.=/div> 2. It is then pr=cessed for an open sub-band frequency and filed with FCC </=> 3. The =CC su
confirm tomorrow. Also Boss FYI: As per our discussion on the dragonwave licensing procedure. M= findings are as follows: I spoke to Ms. Hardly at=Micronet (the company that licensed your first dragonwaves) . Th=y confirmed the timeframe that FutureTech stated that this process does ta=e from 30 - 90 da
Entities connected to both Doug Band and Micronet