Epstein Secrets

a rereesmom lots and iptaraliC~Obt a dalt combned to Maw one nand ei the • trade dime <Main pesents the copal balsagen traledae • GANN attarkiet Bandt and maned sod thai the inir calk for eatyrodenplenwil be watted meanty by lot tom aØ al imam of that iste held m sut name a re ~manna ler PX Mee

test seamen on etch tie are orproblem eppered - band. )era heir ad aCCoull null (II alp - Deurite to

gh the On. salable to cab balances are Sn ip? to depOS4 aCCOuntS a 18$ AG Net York BrrS, aid 1BSAG Carman Bunt Theserlepost se ria muted by the FOC Salinas hekl If the 18$ AG Capon Brach ere towourily ..posed to the marts, rita of theCarnal bands. and Mere C re> quaranee a other ob itatim DIMS 46 to wa

~ Depose acorn at Lid But LISA ana dn. ah.lemad band partsvang n the UPS FDIC nand Program ar• FIX-no

e AT /PMCOGAN CHASE BAW, NA -234363 Total other feuds debited Date Armor DesaiptIon -52.243.63 Arrount IS) Money balance activities Avg 30 Salinas forward $3272.32 Sep 4 withdrawal UBS BANK USA DEPOSIT ACCOUNT AS OF 09t03/19 3,27232 Sep 5 Deposit WS DANK USA (( POSIT ACCOUNT 323238 Sep

A up to an ratted LW ad that to 125 IC Stamford Band, a a Matey Furd Deposes at WS Bak USA are FOC mu

ft Om evadable to arh Armors are snipt to depose aCCOurin a tan AG Nettork BrasCh and UBS/4 Caplan 8ran:h nine depOSIS ire rta nosed by the FDIC Salinas hell aft vliS AG Carlin Swath ate trayontily exposed 10 The wraps MA of the Cafto flora and there it ro guinea oft ell loan of 185 AG b way tie D

t in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, No. 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the internet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) beca

t that argument ignores a fundamental tenet of conspiracy law. It is axiomatic that a conspiracy does not require a completed substantive crime. See Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 65 (1997) ("It is elementary that a conspiracy may exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensure

t in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, No. 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the intemet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) becau

t that argument ignores a fundamental tenet of conspiracy law. It is axiomatic that a conspiracy does not require a completed substantive crime. See Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 65 (1997) ("It is elementary that a conspiracy may exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensure

t in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, No. 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the intemet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) becau

t that argument ignores a fundamental tenet of conspiracy law. It is axiomatic that a conspiracy does not require a completed substantive crime. See Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 65 (1997) ("It is elementary that a conspiracy may exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensure

erest in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the Internet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) beca

t that argument ignores a fundamental tenet of conspiracy law. It is axiomatic that a conspiracy does not require a completed substantive crime. See Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 65 (1997) ("It is elementary that a conspiracy may exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensure

t in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, No. 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the intemet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) becau

t that argument ignores a fundamental tenet of conspiracy law. It is axiomatic that a conspiracy does not require a completed substantive crime. See Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 65 (1997) ("It is elementary that a conspiracy may exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensure