Epstein Secrets

actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights

entitled to both his silence and his lawsuit." Boys & Girls Clubs of Marion County, Inc. v. J.A., 22 So.3d 855, 856 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App. 2009) (Griffin, J., concurring specially). Thus, "a person may not seek affirmative relief in a civil action and then invoke the fifth amendment to avoid giving di

bid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them"); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200. 1203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001). 21 DWI 15&45345v3 3070112-000042 EFTA00596475 In sum, Edwards has simply "failed to

1 (1988) 1, 2, 22 People ex reL Scott v. Silverstein, 412 II2d 692 (III. App. Ct. 1980), rev d on other rounds, 429 M2d 483 (1981) 29 People v. Griffin, 1992 WL 474518 (Sup. Ct. ig Co. Nov. 12, 1992) 24, 26 People v. Royster, 43 .U1758, 842 ad 12 (1st Dep't 2007) 26 Pugh v. Avis Rent A 1997 W

09/18, Menn, Nakashima), Fox News (09/18, Sorace), CNN (09/18, Lyngaas), the Washington Times (09/18, Lovelace), CyberScoop (09/18, Starks, Vicens, Vasquez), The Record (09/18, Warminksky), MeriTalk (09/18, Burgan), BleepingComputer (09/18, Ilascu), The Epoch Times (09/18, Thornebrooke), Inside Cybersec

ller, Sakellariadis), USA Today (09/18, Meyer), BBC (09/18, Debusmann Jr, Epstein), the Washington Examiner (09/18, O'Keefe), New York Post (09/18, Griffin), The Hill (09/18, Beitsch), Bloomberg (09/18, Strohm), The Telegraph (09/18, White), The Independent (09/18, Marcus), The Daily Beast (09/18, McDou