Epstein Secrets

ned to apply Helder & recommended that motion be denied. 2422(b); 2423; 2253; 1470 Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting D. Me. U.S.' Vasquez, 241 F. Supp. 2d 34 (D. Me. 2003) see also U.S.' Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra Internet Solicited sex from 13 yr-ol

rial detention. 2422(b); 2423 Not Consummated Showed up for meeting 67 EFTA00224201 COURT CASEa FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S., Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) No Information No information available. Motion to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from

Not Consummated Sling U.S. I Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9° Cir. 2006) Internet See 2007 U.S. App LEXIS 12110 (9° Cir. 2007) supra. Stine U.S. I Anderson, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856 (96 Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Online Internet chat, no specific information available. Conviction affirmed.

i law, it would be treading upon the policy choices the Thai government has made in the competing objectives and costs of tort law." Id.; see also Vasquez, 325 F.3d at 675 & n. 14 (holding that application of Texas law, where there was little justification for doing so to right any perceived inequiti

and law would promote "(u]niformity and accommodation of the competing policies of the two nations." Punyee, 2004 WL 2511144, at *9; see also Vasquez. 325 F.3d at 675 ("Uniformity, predictability, and accommodation of the competing policies of the two nations favor applying Mexican law."). *8 W

porting its version of the material facts or to refute the moving party's contention that the facts entitle it to judgment as a matter of law. See Anderson, 477 U.S. at 256-257, 106 S.Ct. 2505. The Court need not accept mere conclu- sory allegations, whether they are made in the complaint or a sworn s

Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 69 EFTA00226327 ,. rre f I :.. .- CASES -FACILITY FACTS/COMNIUNICATIOMIllt GE ,.Mr U.S. I Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) No Information Motion No information available. to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from

2339 (D. Me. 2003) No Information Motion No information available. to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from bag denied. See U.S., Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra N.D.N.Y. U.S. I. Johnson, . 2005 U.S. Dist LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Internet Internet chat

Not Consummated Sting U.S.. Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9i° Cir. 2006) Internet See 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12110 (9th Cir. 2007) supra. Sting U.S. I Anderson, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856 (9th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Online Internet chat, no specific information available. Conviction affirmed.

444638 Whitesides Group - Publications Page 5 of I9 Denaturation with Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate", Gudiksen, K. L., Urbach, A. R., Gitlin, I., Yang, Vasquez, J. A., Costello, C. E. and Whitesides, G. M., Anal. Chem., 2004, 76, 7151-7161. 889. "An Integrated Approach to a Portable and Low-Cost Immunoassa

Groups They Incorporate: Studies Using Protein Charge Ladders, Capillary Electrophoresis, and Debye-Hiickel Theory", Carbeck, J. D., Colton, I. J., Anderson, J. R., Deutch, J. M. and Whitesides, G. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 10671.10679. 675. "Fabrication of Photonic Crystal Lasers by Nanomoldin

meeting atin 65 EFTA01729549 COURT . .• r - :l 4VS* • - , .!, , ' iiettiiii•H.:FACiPeoMMISOws.:110N: . . .. . , _ i c 9 • U.S. v. Vasquez, 241 F. Supp. 2d 34 (D. Me. 2003) see also U.S. v. Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra Internet Solicited sex from 13 yr-

) No Information U.S. v. Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2006) Internet See 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12110 (9'h Cir. 2007) supra. • Sting US. v. Anderson, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856 (9'h Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet . Online chat, no specific information available; conviction affirmed. 2422(6

ed up for meeting aqui 65 EFTA00079478 py_ " 40 el -• . .;L:1115 &ft. %✓ile• '. . J ki I 6 a COJ . . ... . 4'' ..- D. Me. U.S. v. Vasquez, 241 F. Supp. 2d 34 (D. Me. 2003) see also U.S. v. Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra Internet Solicited sex from 13 yr-

No Information U.S. v. Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2006) Internet See 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12110 (9th Cir. 2007) supra. .5ths -i U.S. v. Anderson, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856 (9th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Online chat, no specific information available; conviction affirmed. 2422(6)

ements of the crimes the Court provides them, so any assumptions the jury might make about United Kingdom law are irrelevant.14 See United States v. Vasquez, 82 F.3d 574, 577 (2d Cir. 1996) (appropriate to reject defense request for an instruction if it does not "represent[] a theory of the defense with

statements are admissible as proof of a defendant's consciousness of guilt (see Gov't Opp. at 142-43, Dkt. No. 204 (citing, e.g., United States v. Anderson, 747 F.3d 51, 60 (2d Cir. 2014)), the Government does not intend—and so will agree—not to offer this information as part of its case-in-chief, unles