Epstein Secrets

Says It Belongs to Them Since They Are Part of Exclusive Group Fox News (01/27, Whitten) reported that squatters have staked their claim on land in Arkansas, claiming that they are part of a sovereign citizen group known to have engaged in violent confrontations with law enforcement. The article added t

Cromitie, convicted in 2010 of plotting to bomb Jewish sites and military aircraft, was granted "compassionate release" by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who criticized law enforcement for entrapment. According to the article, McMahon's release order highlighted that Cromitie, a small-time criminal,

anted "compassionate release" by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who criticized law enforcement for entrapment. According to the article, McMahon's release order highlighted that Cromitie, a small-time criminal, was coerced into the plot by the FBI's informant, Shaheed Hussain, who offered in

Says It Belongs to Them Since They Are Part of Exclusive Group Fox News (01/27, Whitten) reported that squatters have staked their claim on land in Arkansas, claiming that they are part of a sovereign citizen group known to have engaged in violent confrontations with law enforcement. The article added t

Cromitie, convicted in 2010 of plotting to bomb Jewish sites and military aircraft, was granted "compassionate release" by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who criticized law enforcement for entrapment. According to the article, McMahon's release order highlighted that Cromitie, a small-time criminal,

anted "compassionate release" by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who criticized law enforcement for entrapment. According to the article, McMahon's release order highlighted that Cromitie, a small-time criminal, was coerced into the plot by the FBI's informant, Shaheed Hussain, who offered in

nnot make a knowing and voluntary decision about whether to testify and or to assert her right to remain silent. U.S. CONST. amends. V, VI; Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 51 (constitution guarantees a defendant the right to testify in her defense); Brown v. Artuz, 124 F.3d 73, 78 (2d Cir. 1997) (wavier

inal) (quoting Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 398 (1978)). Here, the government violated due process when it misrepresented and misled Chief Judge McMahon in an ex pane proceeding to circumvent the civil protective order, and it independently would violate due process for the government to be allowed

nnot make a knowing and voluntary decision about whether to testify and or to assert her right to remain silent. U.S. CONST. amends. V, VI; Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 51 (constitution guarantees a defendant the right to testify in her defense); Brown v. Artuz, 124 F.3d 73, 78 (2d Cir. 1997) (wavier

inal) (quoting Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 398 (1978)). Here, the government violated due process when it misrepresented and misled Chief Judge McMahon in an ex pane proceeding to circumvent the civil protective order, and it independently would violate due process for the government to be allowed