Epstein Secrets

ard, John Knud Furst, Kim FUrst, and Nina Furst. Maria T. Hodge, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defenda

er when a trial verdict is `clearly unsupported' by amount needed to make the plaintiff judge concludes the evidence and whole[.]" Starceski v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 54 F.3d 1089, 1100 (3d Cir. 1995) (citations omitted); see also Brunnemann v. Terra Int'l, Inc., 975 F.2d 175, 178 (5th Cir. 1992) remitti

d by facsimile (561) 802-1787, and U.S. mail to: Maria Villifana, Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, 500 uth

worthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolutions Trust Corp.,. 5 F.3d 1508, 1514 (D.C.Cir.1993); In re Bieter Co., 16 F.3d 929, 936-38 (8111 Cir. 1994); Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Republic of Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1424 (3d Cir. 1991); United States v. Cote, 456 F.2d 142, 144 (81h Cir. 1972); United States v. J

ATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 17, 2007, a true and correct copy of the forging motion was furnished by facsimile and U.S. mail to: Maria , Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, 500 uth Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. By: ROY BLACK, ESQ Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein

angworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolutions Trust Corp.r5 F.3d 1508, 1514 (D.C.Cir.1993); In re Bieter Co., 16 F.3d 929, 936-38 (8th Cir. 1994); Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Republic of Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1424 (3d Cir. 1991); United States v. Cote, 456 F.2d 142, 144 (8th Cir. 1972); Uni Judson, 322 F.