Epstein Secrets

factual 18:4 33:11 36:21 far 9:13 13:15 17:7 Farmer 2:8 3:17,18 4:5 12:25 13:12,16,23 14:6,8,15 15:

0 16:21 18:2025:17,17 27:7 33:9 38:18,18,20 38:20,22,22 42:15,18 43:12 45:7 47:9,19 48:9,13 maybe 23:3 24:2 27:9 38:23 42:15 ma'am 4:18 6:21 McClean 29:8,22 31:1 McLACHLAN 24:11 24:12,25 25:9 McLAUCHLAN 2:13 4:6,7 7:14 8:22 10:21 10:25 11:9 25:6 mean 39:7 40:10 42:19 means 32:18 meant 24:1

etained images or copies of the subject documents 11 on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains 12 jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, 13 Brad Edwards, or his client. That order was entered in 14 November of 2010. IS As far as any of the interested, protected 16 parties, that i

OUELLETTE & MA LDIN RT REPORTERS, INC. EFTA00787710 Page 29 Page 31 1 provisions of Title 11. I order. That is by definition in the In Re: McClean case, 2 Courts have held, and we've cited them in 2 and countless other 11th Circuit cases, and lower court 3 our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts

tein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards, or his client. That order was entered in November of 2010. As far as any of the interested, protected parties, that is Farmer Jaff

laid out, I don't think there could ever be a basis for it, but this also gets to the discovery point, and even though the 11th Circuit in In Re: McClean, they affirm a finding of punitive damages, which are by definition criminal, because it's punishment, as opposed to purely compensatory damages,