Epstein Secrets

t Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

either good cause or any law in support thereof, fails to satisfy the heightened requisite showing for an order of protection, mandating denial of Edwards's Motion. Third, Edwards asserts that a protective order is warranted because the production requested "is unnecessarily intrusive into the financial privac

700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Brac lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

Ponzi Scheme was becoming urgent. Depositions taken of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeld: Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR. The court rejected Edwards's Motion, calling it "devoid of evidence." See Order in Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Dated November 5, 2009, 08-cv-80119. The connection between many of these

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, E Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

as "government privilege," notwithstanding that it is he who is prosecuting this matter and who bears the burden of proof. As such, not only should Edwards's Motion to preclude evidence be denied, but Edwards should also be precluded from presenting any evidence or testimony for which he has asserted any privil