Document Mentions (4 shared documents)

EFTA00808426

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

te 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Counsel for Farmer Ja,ffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, a

ourt to summarily deny the Intervenors' claims, particularly after this Court provided them with ample opportunity to support them with the ordered Summary of Damages. Instead of providing a factual basis and support for their claims, the Intervenors' Summary of Damages conclude that, "Epstein and his counsel have

EFTA00810602

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

d Response in Opposition to Bradley Edwards' and Farmer Jaffe's Summaries of Damages for violation of the

hile allowing the victims to supplement their summary to respond to the arguments made by Epstein. DE 6427. Thereafter, the victims filed a further Summary of Damages, alleging significant emotional distress. DE 6432. After the victims filed their summary, Epstein did not file any answer or response, even though

EFTA00794056

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

k on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings 06/27/18 SJL Work on Response to B. Edwards' and Farmer 8.20 6,150.00 Jaffe's Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings; f

Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings 06/27/18 SJL Work on Response to B. Edwards' and Farmer 8.20 6,150.00 Jaffe's Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings; follow up with M. Weinberg and J. Goldberg r