Epstein Secrets

t Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

he onus of supplying the information or documents is inordinate." Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins, 763 So. 2d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boecher, 733 So. 2d 993, 994 (Fla.1999) (noting the lack of "affidavits, depositions or other sworn testimony in the record to support Allstate's

893-CIV Marra/Johnson; see also privilege log of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, Feb

d." Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999). "This rule applies in cases of summary judgments as well." Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 546 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 1989); see also Rivernider, supra (holding that although trial judge erred in granting summary judgment based upon the

& Weiss, PA Marc Nurik, Esq. Brac lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman Fred Hadda

, 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the

OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by mail and this day of May, 2011 on Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, et al, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Alan Goldberger, Atterbury, Goldberger &

are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in the case in which the discovery is sought. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(1); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 1995). 10. "Pretrial discovery was implemented to simplify the issues in a case, to eliminate the element of