Epstein Secrets

of 2 COUNSEL LIST Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, FL

COTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, REPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COUNTERCLAIM Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, replies to the Affirniative Defenses asserted by JEFFREY EPSTEIN by stating that such defenses do not constitute legally cogniz

FL 33401 Fax: Attorneys ore ey pstein Gaiy M. Farmer, Esq. er, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Le

ories 4. The use of written interrogatories is the least burdensome, least expensive and ml expeditious discovery means available to the Defendant/Counterplaintiff by which to obtain nejessary information and narrow trial issues. 5. The Plaintiff/Counterdefendant will not be prejudiced through the granting of

Pladne: Attbrneys for Jeffrey Epstein Ga1y M. Farmer, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos &

EPSTEIN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counterplaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, hereby gives notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Expert Interrogatories numbered 1 through

at a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this IF day of June, 2010: Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Attorneys for Defendant, Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Gol

ICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOaMBAG EDWARDS' RESPONSE TO FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS Defendant/Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, hereby files his Response to Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Request for Admissions to Edwards dated June 18, 2010 as hollo

each. FL 33401 Attorneys for e Epstein Gap/ M. Farmer, Esq. er, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Le

8/007 4. The use of written interrogatories is the least burdensome, least expensive and ml expeditious discovery means available to the Defendant/Counterplaintiff by which to obtain nejessary information and narrow trial issues. 5. The Plaintiff/Counterdefendant will not be prejudiced through the granting of

Palm Beach, FL 33401 rneys for Jeiirey Ga1y M. Farmer, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos &

, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING EXPERT INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFEN'DANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant/Counterplaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, hereby gives notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Expert Interrogatories numbered 1 through

nue South, Suite 1400 Welt Palm Beach, FL 33401 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehlrrnan, P

H JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLOM] )A CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAO NOTICE OF FILING PAGE AND LINE DESIGNATIONS Defendant/Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned attoirneys, submits the designation of the entire deposition of PlaintifECormterclefendant, JE

of 2 COUNSEL LIST Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, FL

COTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, REPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COUNTERCLAIM Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, replies to the Affirniative Defenses asserted by JEFFREY EPSTEIN by stating that such defenses do not constitute legally cogniz