Epstein Secrets

id. The recently disbanded South Florida firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL had s

dwards' malicious prosecution counterclaim against Epstein. Farmer Jaffe filed its motion last month in the bankruptcy liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. Edwards is representing Farmer Jaffe in the sa

n of Carlton Fields. Edwards is represented by Jack Scarola and David P. Vitale of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA. The case is In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, case number 0:09-bk-34791, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al.,

nications from Farmer Jaffe in connection with claims he brought against Edwards, Rothstein and a victim client, according to the sanctions motion. Farmer )affe asked that Epstein bear the costs of copying and organizing the documents. That could be performed without reading them, but Farmer Jaffe stil

ubstantial compliance made in good faith," Judge Ray said. The sanctions matter is before the bankruptcy court in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. During the bankruptcy of RRA, which collapsed

rint?section-florida Edwards is represented by Jack Scarola and David P. Vitale of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA. The case is In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, case number 0:09-bk-34791, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al.,

y or on behalf of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L

communications concerning or containing information derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards. MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking

er. The recently disbanded South Florida firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL broug

s or copies of the documents. The issue ended up before the bankruptcy court because Epstein filed his subpoena in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. EFTA00805053 Scarola noted during Friday's h

stein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his client." The bankruptcy court permitted Fowler White access to the electronic data because the firm could make the copies and

on has caused irreparable harm." Farmer Jaffe filed its motion in bankruptcy court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. Edwards is representing Farmer Jaffe in the san