Epstein Secrets

new jury and pushing back the opening arguments of the trial until later this week. Mr. Craig's lawyers raised the objection Tuesday, saying Judge Jackson's decision to close the courtroom a day earlier while lawyers questioned potential jurors tainted the selection process. Mr. Craig's team said that

. The Administrative Office's practice of paying appointed special prosecutors' fees is "usual in Rule 42(a) appointments," said the 2006 decision. Harry Sandick, a former prosecutor and white-collar defense partner at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, said he couldn't recall a lawyer in private practice being

new jury and pushing back the opening arguments of the trial until later this week. Mr. Craig's lawyers raised the objection Tuesday, saying Judge Jackson's decision to close the courtroom a day earlier while lawyers questioned potential jurors tainted the selection process. Mr. Craig's team said that

. The Administrative Office's practice of paying appointed special prosecutors' fees is "usual in Rule 42(a) appointments," said the 2006 decision. Harry Sandick, a former prosecutor and white-collar defense partner at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, said he couldn't recall a lawyer in private practice being

new jury and pushing back the opening arguments of the trial until later this week. Mr. Craig's lawyers raised the objection Tuesday, saying Judge Jackson's decision to close the courtroom a day earlier while lawyers questioned potential jurors tainted the selection process. Mr. Craig's team said that

. The Administrative Office's practice of paying appointed special prosecutors' fees is "usual in Rule 42(a) appointments," said the 2006 decision. Harry Sandick, a former prosecutor and white-collar defense partner at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, said he couldn't recall a lawyer in private practice being