Epstein Secrets

y filing a complaint with (a) court.'" OppenheimI Campbell, 571 F.2d 660, 663 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (quoting Fed

g the Court's CM/ECF system: Attorneys for the Government Thomas Scott [email protected] COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. Dadeland Centre II Kendall Coffey Gabriel Groisman Groisman Benjamin H. Brodsky COFFEY BURLINGTON, P.L. Attorneys for Alan Dershowitz /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 20 EFTA00210688

issue through some affirmative act for his own benefit, the privilege will not be allowed to protect against disclosure of such information. In re Campbell, 248 B.R. 435 (M.D. Fla. 2000). Here, Edwards has made these underlying cases in which he represented these plaintiffs against Epstein the central i

at page 91-92; line 25-1. MR. KING: The same objection, all based on work product. Id. at page 92; line 2- 3. Q: Did you ever have any contact with Kendall Coffey regarding the propriety or ask him for an opinion of the propriety of taking that book from Mr. Rodriguez? Id. at page 95; line 1-4. MR. KING: The

ate Judge Donald Cabell denied bail for two men who have been accused of helping Carlos Ghosn, who previously ran Nissan Motor Co., flee Japan, with Cabell determining that the men, 59-year-old Michael Taylor and 27-year-old Peter Taylor, both of whom are facing extradition to Japan, are flight risks.

unty Sheriff's Office sergeant Chad Coffey "faces two counts of obstruction of justice following an investigation into the department's drug unit." Coffey "is expected to surrender to authorities in the coming days," and he "wants his day in court to defend himself against the charges." Attorney Hart M

filing a complaint with (a) court.'" Oppenheon I. Campbell, 571 F.2d 660, 663 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (quoting Fed

400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Fax: 561 820-8777 Attorneys for the Government Thomas Scott ar COLE. SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. -and- Kendall Coffey Gabriel Groisman Benjamin H. Brodsk n om COFFEY BURLINGTON. P.L. Attorneys for Alan Dershowit: /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 20 EFTA00188661 Case 9

issue through some affirmative act for his own benefit, the privilege will not be allowed to protect against disclosure of such information. In re Campbell, 248 B.R. 435 (M.D. Fla. 2000). Here, Edwards has made these underlying cases in which he represented these plaintiffs against Epstein the central i

at page 91-92; line 25-1. MR. KING: The same objection, all based on work product. Id. at page 92; line 2- 3. Q: Did you ever have any contact with Kendall Coffey regarding the propriety or ask him for an opinion of the propriety of taking that book from Mr. Rodriguez? Id. at page 95; line 1-4. MR. KING: The