Epstein Secrets

VANGIESON,ANN GIBSON,SUSAN STEWARD,CAMPBELL GURRENTZ,MARTIN A SIRIGOTIS,JAMES

OU PROPERTIES II LLC WALKER,NANCY G CALLAWAY,BRENDA T RAQUET,WALTER F OCEAN GRAN

me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the issue. You've done your job. S don't want to get bin confused with the

wards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k of their privil

me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the issue. You've done your job. S don't want to get bin confused with the

wards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k of their privil

nt to nake clear that I'm finding IS believe he are entitled to is a list of all perro"' absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss Campbell or anyorA else from the Link and 16 )7 to whom the privileged documents have been disseminated. Md I'm particularly concerned in Rockenbach firm

em. • presentation. I often refer to a case that I printed directly from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it talks about the trial judge's ultimate So this disk is not a disk of their privileged docunents. It's a disk of 27,500 documents. And wha