Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1995) ("[I]t is not necessary to a conviction under the [Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transport
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1995) ("[I]t is not necessary to a conviction under the [Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transport
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
72 (7th Ci/.1997); United States 1. Meacham, 115 F.3d 14882.1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States Sirois, 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States' Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1995) ("[I]t is not necessary to a conviction under the [Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the trans rt
8-39 (citing United States I. Griffith, 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States, Taylor, 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States I Scisum, 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States Hamilton, 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Governmen
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
[None] Use of intemet to entice 14011 minor to engage in sex activity. 05- "I imothy 4 2 counts of 2422(6) Use of intemet to entice 14024 Campbell 18 U.S.C.S. 2252(aX2); minor to engage in sex activity. 18 U.S.C.S. 2252(AX4)(B) Received and possessed child pornography that had been tran
travel." Evidence related to the "grooming process" was relevant to whether the defendants had the illicit intent necessary under 2423(b). 5) U.S.' Scisum, 32' 3d 1479 (10th Cir. 1994). For a violation of 2423(a), the government must prove that the defendant had formed the intent to have the victim eng
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857732_p3
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
Page: EFTA02857732_p3 →Page EFTA02857732_p9
Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1995) ("[I]t is not necessary to a conviction under the [Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transport
Page: EFTA02857732_p9 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857763_p3
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
Page: EFTA02857763_p3 →Page EFTA02857763_p9
Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1995) ("[I]t is not necessary to a conviction under the [Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transport
Page: EFTA02857763_p9 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p3
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
Page: EFTA02857810_p3 →Page EFTA02857810_p9
Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1995) ("[I]t is not necessary EFTA02857818 to a conviction under the [Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose o
Page: EFTA02857810_p9 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (149)
Entities connected to both Naomi Campbell and Scisum
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON562 w/ Naomi·7 w/ Scisum
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON244 w/ Naomi·6 w/ Scisum
Marc Rich
PERSON157 w/ Naomi·7 w/ Scisum
United States
LOCATION147 w/ Naomi·7 w/ Scisum
LB
Leon Black
PERSON145 w/ Naomi·7 w/ Scisum
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON118 w/ Naomi·6 w/ Scisum
Joe Biden
PERSON111 w/ Naomi·2 w/ Scisum
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON91 w/ Naomi·7 w/ Scisum
New York
LOCATION94 w/ Naomi·3 w/ Scisum
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION89 w/ Naomi·4 w/ Scisum
Paul Ryan
PERSON83 w/ Naomi·2 w/ Scisum
Barry Diller
PERSON73 w/ Naomi·3 w/ Scisum
CW
Courtney Wild
PERSON65 w/ Naomi·6 w/ Scisum
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON65 w/ Naomi·3 w/ Scisum
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION57 w/ Naomi·6 w/ Scisum
Philadelphia
LOCATION55 w/ Naomi·6 w/ Scisum
Colorado
LOCATION50 w/ Naomi·3 w/ Scisum
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON42 w/ Naomi·6 w/ Scisum
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION42 w/ Naomi·5 w/ Scisum
Sarah Kellen
PERSON45 w/ Naomi·2 w/ Scisum